Updates from the Strange Center

UPDATES FROM THE JAMES F. STRANGE CENTER

Since 2019, ASOR has called the James F. Strange Center in Alexandria, VA home. The building has provided space for the ASOR team to grow and thrive, but the passing years have meant that our home was in need of some improvements. A leaking drain from our 3rd-floor HVAC unit pointed to the need for some facilities upgrades.

After reviewing a number of proposals and quotes for the work, ASOR contracted with Cardinal Plumbing and HVAC for:

  • New hot water heater to replace our 30+ year-old model.
  • New HVAC systems (furnace and air conditioning) for all three floors of the building.
  • New drain for the 3rd-floor system.
  • New thermostats on all floors that can be controlled remotely.
  • New flue piping in the basement.

The 1st and 2nd floor now have 92% high efficiency systems. The 3rd floor space was unfortunately too small to accommodate the higher efficiency system.

This is was a large project which involved multiple days of work from our industrious HVAC team. The outcome of this project is that the ASOR office is in great shape for the fall and for many years to come!

Removing old HVAC units from the basement of the Strange Center.
Removal of old HVAC units from the basement of the Strange Center.
Cardinal vans behind the Strange Center.
Fleet of Cardinal vans ready to tackle the project.
New HVAC unit in the Strange Center basement.
New high-efficiency unit in the Strange Center basement.
New outdoor units behind the Strange Center.
New outdoor units ready for install.

The good news is that not only does the Strange Center have great, new, up-to-date equipment, ASOR was able to pay for these upgrades by using distributions from the endowed Building Fund. Thank you to everyone who has made gifts to this fund over the years. Your gifts ensure that ASOR’s home in Alexandria can continue to thrive and grow. There is still room to add your name to the plaque. Make a gift to the Building Fund today.

Building Fund donor plaque in the Strange Center
Regan demonstrates how to use the thermostat at the Strange Center.
Regan demonstrating how to use the new thermostats.
Lucia working on the third floor of the Strange Center.
Lucia enjoys working in the cool environment.

FOA Webinar: Petra Creamer

FRIENDS OF ASOR WEBINARS

How to Plan Your Funeral in Ancient Assyria

Friends of ASOR present the next webinar of the 2024-2025 season on September 18, 2024, at 7:00 pm EDT, presented by Prof. Petra Creamer. This webinar will be free and open to the public. Registration through Zoom (with a valid email address) is required.

Have you ever wondered what the afterlife was like in ancient Mesopotamia?  The complicated world of death has a long and nuanced history throughout various civilizations in the Land Between Rivers.  Community identity, family, status, gender, and many more variables played into how one would be buried and what they could expect to encounter in the afterlife awaiting them. During the Assyrian Empire (c. 1350-612 BCE) some funerary traditions were kept from previous periods, while others were newly introduced.  New imperial pressures, migration patterns, and forced resettlement during the Assyrian Empire beget a new set of mortuary norms.  At the same time, some groups struggled to maintain their traditions in the face of a changing social and political landscape.  This talk explores the variety of funerary traditions present in the Assyrian Empire and how they changed over time – telling us just as much about those alive as those deceased.

Petra Creamer is an Assistant Professor of Ancient Near Eastern Studies at Emory University, studying the genesis and growth of empires and the impact of empires on the non-elite populations under their hegemony.  She is director of the excavation project Rural Landscapes of Iron Age Imperial Mesopotamia, where her ongoing fieldwork addresses long-term settlement patterns and lifeways in the ancient Assyrian imperial core (c. 1350-600 BCE). She has conducted fieldwork in Iraqi Kurdistan, Iraq, Turkey, Oman, Italy, Azerbaijan, Greece, and the U.S.A. Her current book project ties together multiple levels of looking at Assyrian imperial power – from broad landscape management down to individual burials – to understand the degree of control Assyrian elites held over those under imperial hegemony.

SPONSOR A WEBINAR!

Several levels of support from $50-$1,000 are available. Proceeds go towards membership scholarships and towards increasing ASOR’s virtual resources. Each sponsorship is tax-deductible and includes benefits! Sponsor a webinar here. 

WHY SPONSOR ONLY ONE?

Season Sponsorships are also available from the ASOR Online Store here!

Click here for more information on the benefits of becoming a season sponsor or sponsoring a single webinar.

Mesopotamian Fellowship Report: Agnese Vacca

“Crafting Complexity”. Pottery Production and Consumption at Helawa (Erbil Plain) between the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic Periods

Agnese Vacca, University of Milan, Mesopotamian Fellowship Recipient

Aims of the “Crafting Complexity” Project

The project aims at studying pottery production and consumption at Helawa (Erbil Plain) in a diachronic perspective–from the Ubaid to the Late Chalcolithic period (5th-4th millennium BC) – by means of technological and archaeometric analyses to ultimately explore the process of craft specialization and standardization, and their major implications for our understanding of complex societies in this crucial area of Northern Mesopotamia. Several studies focusing on ceramics have, in fact, pointed out that major changes in pottery production and distribution occurred in Mesopotamia in connection with the process of 4th millennium BCE urbanization, resulting in a highly specialized and intensified production performed at an extra-household level, reflected in the emergence of a standardized and mass-produced repertoire.

The project targets encompass the realization of mineralogical and petrographic characterization (thin sections, XRD, XRF, Raman Spectroscopy) on a selected sample of vessels (ca. 100 sherds) to reconstruct pottery traditions within the Helawa assemblage, understood as the result of different systems of production and consumption, passed down within a group or society. Furthermore, compositional analyses (INAA) are also envisaged to investigate ceramic production and circulation at an extra-site level, facilitating the comparison with the results already obtained for the pottery assemblage of nearby Chalcolithic sites such as Surezha, investigated by an American expedition of the Oriental Institute of Chicago (Stein 2018; Minc et al. 2019).

As a major output, the project aims at producing a database encompassing qualitative (drawings and photos) and quantitative (metric, petrographic, chemical) data intertwined with a solid stratigraphic and typo-chronological ceramic sequence, anchored to C14 dates. This dataset has the potential to carry out multivariate analyses to investigate in a diachronic perspective the relationship between the technical dimension of ceramic production, the degree of specialization, the transmission of knowledge between potters, and the socio-economic organization of prehistoric communities at Helawa, providing a frame of reference from a key-site to be compared with neighboring settlements in the Erbil Plain and more broadly in the Trans-Tigridian region.

 

The site of Helawa and the MAIPE Expedition in the Erbil Plain

During the last decades, dozens of international projects were launched in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq contributing to the definition of a new theoretical framework for this key area located in the Trans-Tigridian region, between the well-known Jazirah region and Southern Mesopotamia (Kopanias et al. 2015).

Tell/Gird Helawa (ca. 10ha) is situated about 28 km south-west from the modern city of Erbil, in the fertile Erbil plain, and has been investigated since 2013 – together with the site of Aliawa – by the MAIPE Expedition (Missione Archeologica Italiana nella Piana di Erbil) of the University of Milan under the direction of Luca Peyronel, with Agnese Vacca as Vice-director (Fig.1). Archaeological investigations at the sites of Helawa and Aliawa, with their multi-period occupation, allow an integrated reconstruction of the history of the region from the first Neolithic villages (ca. 7th millennium BC) to the fortified centers of the Parthian and Sasanian periods down to the early Islamic Age (3rd century BC-8th century AD). The MAIPE project carries out archaeological excavations, geo-archaeological and geophysical research, bio-archaeological studies and archaeometric analyses in agreement with the Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritage and the Directorate of Antiquities of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, promoting activities to enhance the local historical-archaeological heritage and disseminating the project’s results.

Fig. 1. Map of the Trans-Tigridian region with the location of Helawa and Aliawa in the Erbil Plain.
Fig. 1. Map of the Trans-Tigridian region with the location of Helawa and Aliawa in the Erbil Plain.

The 2016-2023 archaeological investigations carried out on the top of the Helawa mound (Area A) and along its southern slopes (Step Trench B) brought to light a seamless Halaf to Late Chalcolithic 3 (LC) sequence featuring an exceptional state of preservation of the structures, with rich in situ inventories encompassing complete and restorable vessels (Peyronel et al. 2019; Peyronel, Vacca 2020; Vacca et al. 2020). Moreover, two pottery workshops dating to the Ubaid and LC1 were excavated, allowing the analysis of both direct evidence of ceramic manufacture (furnaces and installations), and indirect variables inferred from the products themselves (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Tell Helawa with excavated areas 2016-2023. Viewed from the drone. ©MAIPE.

The last phase of occupation of the prehistoric mound dates to the early LC 3 (ca. 3850-3600 BC), and encompasses domestic structures excavated on the lower mounded area to the north-east (Area D)and one large tripartite building with adjoined rooms to the east and a courtyard paved with pebbles and sherds to the west (Area A, Step Trench B; Figs 2-3). After the LC 3 period, the site was abandoned and reoccupied a few centuries later, during the mid-2nd millennium BC.

Fig. 3. Helawa, schematic plan of excavated levels in Step Trench B and Area A. ©MAIPE.
Fig. 3. Helawa, schematic plan of excavated levels in Step Trench B and Area A. ©MAIPE.

A large number of vessels has been collected from the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic contexts excavated thus far and sorted out for chrono-typological studies (ca. 3042 diagnostic sherds). Pottery finds have been classified in relation to the detailed stratigraphic and architectural sequence allowing the reconstruction of a relative ceramic periodization, that has been then anchored to a series of radiocarbon dating obtained for the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic levels (Vacca, Peyronel 2022). This preliminary typological and functional classification of the pottery assemblage from stratified contexts represents a solid base to carry out targeted analyses on techno-morphological and techno-petrographic feature.

Materials and Method

The available dataset consists of 3042 sherds from the 2016-2022 excavations at Helawa, which have been already drawn, filed, and arranged in the MAIPE GIS platform. The whole assemblage has been sorted out in major ceramic classes, or ware groups (e.g., Simple Ware, Painted Simple Ware, Gray Ware, Cooking Ware), based on observable macroscopic characteristics, such as paste colour, hardness, inclusions, and surface treatment. Within each ware group, vessels have been then sorted out according to specific shape classes (open/closed) and morpho-functional types previously defined based on the statistical occurrence of formal and stylistic attributes (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Helawa, Late Chalcolithic 1-3 ceramic types. ©MAIPE.
Fig. 4. Helawa, Late Chalcolithic 1-3 ceramic types. ©MAIPE.

Out of 3042 sherds, 100 diagnostic fragments (25 dating to the Ubaid, 25 to the LC1, 25 to the LC2 and 25 to the LC3) have been selected and imported in Italy in agreement with the Directorate of Antiquities to carry out archaeometric analyses. Selected sherds are being analysed according to two main interrelated tasks:

1) Technological analyses: the different types of vessels classified according to morphological criteria, have been also studied and described based on recognizable diagnostic features related to specific techniques, methods, and tools, making use of digital high-resolution images obtained with a portable microscope (Dino-lite®) and experimental reference material (Roux and Courty 1998). Different manufacturing techniques (e.g., slab modelling, moulding, coiling, and throwing) have been identified, considering that each method produces characteristic surface features or macro-traces that can be interpreted as distinct manufacturing modes or potter’s gestures. Information about the formation and shaping process, including the use of rotative kinetic energy (RKE), has thus been described through the observation of macro traces recognised on the surface of the vessels and in cross-section. These descriptions have then been compared with information on the distribution and alignment of voids gathered through the analysis of thin sections. 

2) Mineralogical-petrographic investigations: a selection of 100 sherds has already been sampled and submitted to petrographic analyses at the Department of Earth Science of the University of Milan (G.D. Gatta, G. Morabito, D. Comboni). Pottery samples are being analysed in thin section under polarizing optical microscope, using SEM with attached X-ray spectrometer and EMP, to define petrographic groups homogeneous in the microstructure and groundmass, and to obtain a detailed characterisation of inclusions, matrix, porosity, and slip. Moreover, the mineral composition is being determined by X-ray diffraction of the selected ceramics (XRF) at the Department of Geosciences, University of Padova (L. Maritan). The ware groups, previously defined through macroscopic observations of sherds, are thus being reassessed according to petrographic groups suggesting a reduced number of fabric types identified through petrographic analysis compared with those recognized by the excavators.

Moreover, a selection of 50 sherds that have been previously thin sectioned in Milan have been shipped to the USA to perform multielement bulk compositional analyses (INAA) at the Oregon State University Archaeometric Laboratory (L. Minc). Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis is aimed to explore compositional variation in ceramics in the Erbil Plain, comparing the results of the Helawa assemblage with that obtained for the site of Surezha (Minc et al. 2019) and more broadly with analyses of ceramics from the northernmost site of Tepe Gawra (Rothman and Blackman 2003). Furthermore, the chemical composition of pottery will be compared with geomorphological samples collected in the area around the site and already processed by the Department of Earth Science of the University of Milan (A. Zerboni, L. Forti).

Preliminary Results 

While archaeometric analyses are still ongoing some preliminary results can be described in terms of petrofabrics and manufacture of vessels in a diachronic perspective, from the Ubaid to the Late Chalcolithic period. Overall, the mineralogical association of the analyzed samples is very similar, suggesting the use of comparable raw material sources through time, with a difference in the composition of the fabrics mainly related to the addition of aggregates as well as to firing temperature, the latter resulting in newly formed phases such pyroxene and gehlenite (Morabito et al. in press). The composition and mineralogy of pottery is compatible with clay sediments found in the surrounding area suggesting that the use of local clay is highly probable. 

Local production is also envisaged by the discovery of firing structures dating to the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic 1 respectively. In fact, excavations in Step Trench B, brought to light an Ubaid pottery production area with a large rectangular-shaped kiln (nearly cut through toward the east by a later pit), standing over 0.50 m high, with the firing chamber filled with ashy layers and overfired vessels. Immediately to the south of the kiln were a series of small rectangular mudbrick rooms that have been interpreted as pottery manufacturing installations and bins for clay preparation (Fig. 5). The small finds retrieved in association with the pottery workshop mainly consist of few ring scrapers, grinding stones, mortars, and lithic implements that could relate to the preparation of clay and the grinding of pigments (Peyronel et al. 2019). A parallel for the Helawa pottery workshop is represented by the Late Ubaid/LC 1 complex excavated at Tell Kosak Shamali on the Euphrates Rier, where similar small rooms made of mudbricks connected to kilns were brought to light (Nishiaki et al. 1999). 

In the next LC 1 phase the function of the area is maintained, as documented by the occurrence of numerous kiln wasters, overfired vessels and ring scrapers collected from dumping layers associated with pits and a probable kiln laying beyond the excavation area to the north-west.  

Fig. 5. Helawa, Ubaid pottery kiln K.119 (to the right); stone tools and ring scrapers for pottery manufacture (to the left). ©MAIPE.
Fig. 5. Helawa, Ubaid pottery kiln K.119 (to the right); stone tools and ring scrapers for pottery manufacture (to the left). ©MAIPE.

Fig. 5. Helawa, Ubaid pottery kiln K.119 (to the right); stone tools and ring scrapers for pottery manufacture (to the left). ©MAIPE.

Even through the centuries and down to modern times, the area of Helawa/Aliawa seems to have been strictly related to pottery production as suggested by the presence of clay quarries identified by geomorphological investigations in the surroundings of Tell Aliawa, and the identification at the same site of an industrial area for pottery production dating to the Akkadian period (mid-late mid-3rd millennium BC), with mudbrick platforms and installations for clay preparation and vessels shaping, and fifty large kilns, some of which reaching 2 m in diameter, organized in clusters and connected each other through a sophisticated system of underground ducts. Pottery production is documented also in later periods, in the 2nd millennium BC, as well as in the Islamic age. Nowadays, traditional brick factories are still operational around Mastawa/Aliawa, extracting clay from local quarries, which is mixed with chaff, water and tempered with straw, shaped through rectangular molds, sun dried and ultimately fired in modern kilns.  

Analyses on the mineralogical composition of sherds (XRD, polarized-light optical microscopy) suggest high firing temperatures during the Ubaid period compared to the Late Chalcolithic, when medium-low firing conditions prevail (Morabito et al in press). The clay composition and recipes employed from one period to the next in the manufacturing of clay vessels indicates a shift from the use of mainly mineral-tempered (Fig. 6a) to coarser chaff-tempered pastes (Fig. 6b) that facilitate to the one hand the shaping of vessels and, to the other, their drying and firing, avoiding shrinkage cracks and thermal shock (Skibo, Schiffer and Reid 1989).  

Finally, the observation of both thin sections under polarized microscope and vessel’s surfaces with a Dino-Light digital microscope (Fig. 6) provides information about the shaping techniques and the tools employed by the potters. In particular, diagnostic elements derived by the microscopic observation of the shape and orientation of voids, as well as the presence of surface features (e.g., concentric parallel striations, fissures and ridges) are being noted to identify the shaping techniques employed and the possible use of rotative devices (Baldi and Roux 2016). Data collected for both the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic periods will be tested against experimental replica.

Fig. 6a) Ubaid (TH.18.B.96/23) and 6b) LC3 (TH.21.A.725/3) sherds from Helawa. Photo taken with Dino-Light digital microscope (©MAIPE).

Fig. 6a) Ubaid (TH.18.B.96/23) and 6b) LC3 (TH.21.A.725/3) sherds from Helawa. Photo taken with Dino-lite® digital microscope (©MAIPE).

References 

Baldi, J.S., Roux, V. 
2016 The innovation of the potter’s wheel: a comparative perspective between Mesopotamia and the southern Levant, Levant 48(3): 236–253, https://doi.org/10.1080/00758914.2016.1230379.

Kopanias, K., MacGinnis, J., Ur, J. 
2015 Archaeological Projects in the Kurdistan Region in Iraq, The Directorate of Antiquities of Kurdistan, Erbil. 

Minc, L., Alden, J., Stein, G.J. 
2019 A preliminary assessment of ceramic style and chemical composition during the Chalcolithic era at Surezha, Iraqi Kurdistan, Paléorient 45(2): 121–136. 

Morabito, G., Comboni, D., Gatta, G.D. 
in press Mineralogical-petrographic investigation of the sherds from the Helawa archaeological site, in L. Peyronel, A. Vacca (eds), Helawa Excavations I – The Southern Stratigraphic Trench (Step Trench B), Milano University Press, Milan. 

Nishiaki, Y., Koizumi, T., Le Mière, M., Oguchi, T. 
1999 Prehistoric Occupations at Tell Kosak Shamali, the Upper Euphrates, Syria, Akkadica 113: 13–68. 

Peyronel, L., Minniti, C., Moscone, D., Naime, Y., Oselini, V., Perego, R., Vacca, A. 
2019 The Italian archaeological expedition in the Erbil Plain, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Preliminary report on the 2016-2018 excavations at Helawa, Mesopotamia 54: 1–104.  

Peyronel, L., Vacca, A. 
2020 Socio-economic complexity at the Late Chalcolithic site of Tell Helawa, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, Paléorient 46(1-2): 83–107. 

Roux, V., Courty, M.-A.
1998 Identification of wheel-fashioning methods: technological analysis of 4th–3rd millennium BC oriental ceramics, Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 747–763. 

Rothman M., Blackman, J. 
2003 Late fifth and early fourth millennium exchange systems in Northern Mesopotamia: chemical characterization of Sprig and Impressed Wares, Al-Rāfidān: Journal of Western Asiatic Studies 24: 1–21. 

Skibo, J.M., Schiffer, M.B., Reid, K.C. 
1989 Organic-tempered pottery: An experimental study, American Antiquity 54(1): 122–146. 

Stein, G.J. 
2018 Excavations at Surezha (Erbil Plain, Kurdistan Region, Iraq) 2017, in C. Woods (ed.), Oriental Institute Annual Report 2017-2018, Chicago: 29–43. 

Vacca, A., Moscone, D., Rosati, P.  
2020 Managing Survey Data from Helawa, Erbil Plain (Kurdistan Region of Iraq), in M. Iamoni (ed.), From the Prehistory of Upper Mesopotamia to the Bronze and Iron Age Societies of the Levant. Proceedings of the Broadening Horizon 5, Udine, Vol. 1 (West & East Monograph 2), Udine: 107–124.   

Vacca, A., Peyronel, L. 
2022 Towards a definition of the Late Chalcolithic Period in the Erbil Plain: The contribution of the Helawa pottery sequence, in J.S. Baldi, M. Iamoni, L. Peyronel, P. Sconzo (eds), Late Chalcolithic Northern Mesopotamia in Context: Papers from a Workshop Held at the 11th ICAANE in Munich, April 5th 2018 (Subartu 48), Turnhout: 85–103.

Introducing ANE Today’s New Website

Introducing The Ancient Near East Today’s New Website

ASOR is pleased to announce the launch of our new website for The Ancient Near East Today (ANE Today), our open-access digital platform for public scholarship, disseminating the latest research, insights, and news about the ancient Near East and beyond. Free to everyone, ANE Today constitutes an important part of ASOR’s mission to encourage public understanding of the cultures and history of the Near East from earliest times until today.

THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST TODAY HOMEPAGE

The website presents a fresh, streamlined interface and will be the new home for all things ANE Today. All past and future ANE Today articles will be found here rather than ASOR’s main website. At the moment, all articles from 2022 to present are available.  We are in the process of updating and migrating the remaining archives (2013–2021) and hope to have them all available by the end of the year.

ANE TODAY’S SEARCH AND CATEGORIES

A search function has been added to ease your experience (and allow you to easily find that one ANE Today article you’ve been looking to cite in your paper). Contributors can find the new url for their past article by simply searching their surname. Not sure what you’re looking for? Categories have been added to help you explore our content.

ANE TODAY’S MAP FEATURE

A new feature we are excited about is an interactive map, located at the bottom of the homepage, allowing you to browse ANE Today articles based on the location of their subject matter. You can even enter the keyword from an article title in the map’s search bar to locate where an article’s subject matter is primarily based. 

Not familiar with ANE Today? ANE Today publishes short, informative articles by emerging and established scholars discussing a variety of topics related to the ancient world. These articles are aimed at non-specialists, providing the public, students, and researchers alike with snapshots of the latest research and thinking about the ancient world. The geographic scope is broad, covering the region from the Atlantic to Afghanistan and anywhere that ancient Near Eastern materials and culture have made an impact.

In addition, ANE Today publishes a biweekly newsletter. This includes not only early access to our latest article, but also a curated selection of links to relevant content — recent news stories related to the ancient world, new books, museum exhibitions, online lectures, podcasts — together with announcements about ASOR activities and opportunities. Issues of the ANE Today are disseminated biweekly via email to anyone who has registered with the Friends of ASOR. To receive The Ancient Near East Today Newsletter, sign-up here — it’s free and you only need to provide a name and email address.

As always, we are interested to know what you think about what can be improved. Feel free to share your thoughts about the new platform with us at info@asor.org.

Join ASOR’s Board of Trustees

CALL FOR TRUSTEE NOMINATIONS

The Trustee Nominations Committee announces an open call for (self) nominations for the ASOR Board of Trustees (Class of 2027). Trustees will serve a three-year term, starting January 1, 2025. There are three primary responsibilities of the members of the Board of Trustees:

  • Governance: Being aware of issues brought forward to the Board, attending two meetings per year (at your own expense), and bringing issues of concern to the Board.
  • Fundraising and financial management: Leading in development by thinking of new opportunities, leading in giving, and providing oversight on the audited financial statements. We ask that individual trustees aspire to contribute $500 or more annually.
  • Strategic planning and policy development: Leading especially in measures that accord with ASOR’s mission.

 

We anticipate two openings for Membership-Elected Trustees. Any full ASOR member may be considered for nomination as an Membership-Elected Trustee. If there is someone that you would like the committee to consider—including yourself—please send the person’s name and email address to Marta Ostovich in the ASOR office. Please check with the nominee as to whether they are interested in serving on the ASOR Board of Trustees before sending in their name. If you have any questions about the responsibilities and satisfactions of being a board member, please email Kathryn Grossman, Chair of the Trustee Nominations Committee.

The ASOR office, or a representative from the Nominations Committee, will contact all nominees to describe the responsibilities in greater detail, and to make sure that the nominee is willing to have his or her name discussed by the Trustee Nominations Committee. Please note that nominees will need to submit a brief biography and a mission (or vision) statement for what they would like to accomplish as a trustee to be considered by the Nominations Committee. A sample of these statements can be found in last year’s “Meet Your Board Nominees” webpage. Brief biographies and mission statements should be ca. 200 words each and submitted via e-mail to Marta Ostovich by noon EDT on September 23, 2024.

After the Committee selects individuals for nomination, the election will take place by electronic ballot during October. ASOR is once again conducting online voting to ensure that more of our members are able to participate in this important process. The ASOR office will work with any person who is not able to complete an electronic ballot to ensure that everyone is included.

In order to receive full consideration by the committee, nominations (including supporting documents) should be submitted to programs@asor.org by noon EDT on September 23, 2024.

AASOR 76 & 77: City and Cemetery

Annual of ASOR 76 & 77: City and Cemetery

City and Cemetery: Excavations at Kourion’s Amathous Gate Cemetery, Cyprus: The Excavations of Danielle A. Parks.

Volume 1: Context, Analysis, and Conclusions
Volume 2: Human Bone, Ecofacts, and Artifacts

ed. by Michael Given, Chris Mavromatis, and R. Smadar Gabrieli

The Amathous Gate Cemetery played a key role in the spatial and social organization of the well-preserved city of Kourion on the south coast of Cyprus, and in its transformations between the Hellenistic and Byzantine periods, from massively destructive earthquakes and the rise of Christianity to new social and administrative structures. The excavations were directed by the late Danielle A. Parks from 1995 to 2000, and found striking evidence for burial and commemoration, a wide range of material culture, and a large assemblage of well-preserved human remains. The project uses an innovative methodology for analyzing mixed stratigraphy and legacy data, which we offer to those researching sites with similar challenges.

Volume 1 presents the chamber tombs and cist tombs, quarrying evidence, and deposition activity from the cleanup after the 370s CE earthquake. It integrates the stratigraphy with the analysis of the material culture and the recording of rock-cut features, and gives a broad interpretation of the results of the whole project.

Volume 2 presents detailed descriptions and interpretations of the ecofacts and artifacts. These include human and animal bone, pottery, lamps, figurines, stone objects, painted plaster, glass, jewelry, coins, and loom weights. Scientific methods include isotopic analysis of the bones, Neutron Activation Analysis of the pottery, and spectroscopic analysis of the glass.

Annual of ASOR, Volume 76, Series Editor William Caraher, June 2024, 296 pages, 147 illustrations & 28 tables. ISBN 9780897571203, $89.95.

Annual of ASOR, Volume 77, Series Editor William Caraher, June 2024, 432 pages, 143 illustrations & 58 tables. ISBN 9780897571210, $99.95.

Special Offer for ASOR Members

ASOR members (with a mailing address in the USA) can purchase a copy of AASOR 76 at the discounted price of $35.00 (65% discount + $5.00 US shipping) while supplies last. Members can also purchase a copy of AASOR 77 at the discounted price of $40.00 (65% discount + $5.00 US shipping) while supplies last. Purchases are restricted to one volume per member. We are unable to offer this discount to members without a US mailing address due to international shipping costs, but you can purchase and ship a copy through the ISD link below. Please contact programs@asor.org with any questions. Click here to purchase your discounted copy in ASOR’s online store.

Available from ISD — Distributor of Scholarly Books
www.isdistribution.com

2024 Dana Grant Report: Exploring Continuity and Transition in Southern Jordan

2024 Dana Grant Report: Exploring Continuity and Transition in Southern Jordan

Jennifer Ramsay, SUNY Brockport; Björn Anderson, University of Iowa; and Craig A. Harvey, University of Alberta

Under the direction of Dr. Jennifer Ramsay (SUNY Brockport), Dr. Björn Anderson (University of Iowa) and Dr. Craig A. Harvey (University of Alberta) (fig. 1), and with the generous support from the Stevan B. Dana project grant, our project launched its first season as a feasibility survey. The primary goal of this survey was to explore archaeological sites around Petra for signs of continuity or transitions in cultural practices from the Iron Age to the Nabataean period (approx. 539-300 BCE). Previous surveys in the region noted material culture from  these periods, but few sites have undergone extensive excavation. This project aims to fill the gap in our understanding of this transitional period by focusing on cultural activities such as ritual, funerary, agriculture, and engineering practices. The survey targeted 12 selected sites where Iron Age and Nabataean material culture overlap, including Conway’s Tower, Mughar an-Nasara, Wadi Farasa, Jebel al-Khutbah, Madhbah, Khirbet al-Megheitah, Bayda, Wadi Musa, Umm el-Biyara, Ghrareh, and Humayma (fig. 2)

Figure 1 The project team in front of al-Khazneh (the Treasury) in Petra (from left to right, Dr. Björn Anderson, Dr. Jennifer Ramsay, Dr. Craig Harvey, Dr. Amanda Harman, Josh Feland and Abdullah al-Saket).
The project team in front of al-Khazneh (the Treasury) in Petra (from left to right, Dr. Björn Anderson, Dr. Jennifer Ramsay, Dr. Craig Harvey, Dr. Amanda Harman, Josh Feland and Abdullah al-Saket).
Figure 2 Map of sites explored during the 2024 feasibility survey.
Figure 2 Map of sites explored during the 2024 feasibility survey.

The field survey, conducted from May 15th to 30th, involved documenting archaeological evidence using Real-Time Kinematic positioning (RTK) with an Emlid RS+ device (fig. 3), traditional and photogrammetric photography (fig. 4), and written descriptions. No artifacts were collected; instead, surface pottery and lithics were recorded through notes and photographs. Over the two-week survey, the team visited and documented 12 sites. Significant accomplishments included high precision photogrammetry of Conway’s Tower (fig. 5), recording of undocumented architectural features across multiple sites (fig.6), including an apparently unknown nefesh at Mughar an-Nasara (fig. 7), and evaluation of likely Zoroastrian influences in funerary practices at Wadi al-Farasa. However, urban encroachment and looting have heavily impacted some sites, including several in the Petra Park; “Site 30” in Wadi Musa seems to have been entirely bulldozed and no traces remain.

Figure 3 Dr. Matt Vincent using RTK to survey in Petra.
Figure 3 Dr. Matt Vincent using RTK to survey in Petra.
Figure 4 Josh Feland carrying out photogrammetry of funerary features in Petra.
Figure 4 Josh Feland carrying out photogrammetry of funerary features in Petra.
Figure 5 Photogrammetry capture of Conway’s Tower.
Figure 5 Photogrammetry capture of Conway’s Tower.
Figure 6 Possible Iron Age wall under Nabataean features of the ‘Dionysian Hall’ at Bayda.
Figure 6 Possible Iron Age wall under Nabataean features of the ‘Dionysian Hall’ at Bayda.
Figure 7 Photogrammetry image of a potentially undocumented nefesh at Mughar an-Nasara, to the left of the staircase in circle.
Figure 7 Photogrammetry image of a potentially undocumented nefesh at Mughar an-Nasara, to the left of the staircase in circle.

The survey helped to identify several sites with promise to elucidate both continuity and transition between the Iron Age and Nabataean periods in the Petra region. Further exploration and detailed analysis are planned and the project aims to continue surveys and eventually undertake targeted excavations to deepen our knowledge of this transitional period. We would like to thank ASOR and the Stevan B. Dana project grant for making our work this summer possible. We also would like to thank the Department of Antiquities of Jordan and their representative Abdullah al-Saket, the Petra Archaeological Park and Qais Tweissi, the American Center of Research (ACOR) in Amman, and various funding sources for their support. We also acknowledge the wonderful contributions of our team members, Dr. Amanda Hardman, Dr. Matt Vincent, graduate student Josh Feland (University of Alberta) and our ceramic virtual consultant Dr. Sarah Wenner.