Fieldwork Report: Sheldon Harmacy

A Triumphant Return to the Field

Sheldon Harmacy, 2024 Strange/Midkiff Families Fieldwork Scholarship

Photo 1: The crew for Square G4. 65 this season, from left to right, Cafir, Abas, Sheldon (me), and Rose
Photo 1: The crew for Square G4. 65 this season, from left to right, Cafir, Abas, Sheldon (me), and Rose.

This summer I excitedly returned to fieldwork as part of the University of Toronto’s team working with the Tayinat Archaeological Project (TAP). The site is integral to my proposed thesis research which aims to explore the role and place of chipped stone technologies following the proliferation of metal technologies in the region. I previously participated in the excavations of Tell Tayinat during the 2022 season, following the completion of my master’s degree. Unfortunately, due to the devastating earthquake that occurred in the region during the spring of 2023, I did not return to the site for the 2023 season. Coming back for this season, I came prepared to both continue to grow and learn as a scholar but also deal with new challenges and resets afforded to the project via the events of 2023. I am incredibly thankful to ASOR and the Strange/Midkiff Families Fellowship for their financial support which allowed me to participate in this season’s investigations.

The damage from 2023 affected much of the region including the major city of Antakya which included the dig house and depot for the TAP project. As such, this year they had to reset and start again from the ground up. Ahead of the field season, the TAP Senior Staff worked feverishly to acquire land and construct a new home for the project as well as set up the various administrative and laboratory spaces and paperwork needed to run the field season. As we were the first to experience this new set up, it was not without its bumps and bruises, but many of us came in ready for the challenge, banding together as a team to work hard and turn our new space into the project’s home.

The site of Tell Tayinat itself, is a large archaeological mound located within the Amuq Valley of Southern Türkiye. The site has a long history of archaeological investigations, beginning with the Braidwood Survey in the 1930s and more recently with the Amuq  Valley Regional Project and associated excavations headed by Dr. Timothy Harrison and the University of Toronto in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The archaeological explorations of the mound itself have focused on the upper mound and identified two major occupational layers, one dated to the Iron Age, and another dated to the Early Bronze Age.

My role in the investigations of the site were as a Square Supervisor within the Early Bronze Area of the site (Field 1). I oversaw both the day-to-day excavation of a specific square but also the various forms of paperwork and digital recording as well as a detailed season report related to the square itself. This was all performed in dialogue with an Area Supervisor, who in my case was Dr. Lynn Welton, a Tayinat veteran and one of the senior staff. Working and learning from Dr. Welton, I continued to hone my skills and approach to the archaeological methods used in the region, in particular dealing with mudbrick, as well as utilizing the OCHRE program for digital recording.

Photo 2: A near complete goblet found within some fill early in the season
Photo 2: A near complete goblet found within some fill early in the season.

My particular square for this season was the same square that I had worked in during the 2022 season. In 2022, we identified a primary phase of architecture for the square and a later ephemeral occupation which was composed of a series of cooking installations cut into the architecture of the primary phase. Our goals for this season were to completely expose and delineate the architecture of the primary phase and attempt to ascertain the function of the various rooms therein. Across the various weeks of excavation, we were ultimately successful in this goal. We were able to delineate the southwestern boundaries of a large building within which were seven relatively small rooms. Curiously similar to the later phase consisting of ephemeral cooking installations, the major elements found within the main phase in the square also pertained to cooking. This included large volumes of coarse ware pottery and a series of ovens, some of which were quite large and possessed associated storage bins.

Returning to the field as part of the TAP project this summer allotted me an exciting field season that provided me with many challenges and opportunities to continue to grow as a field archaeologist and scholar. I look forward to participating in the project in the future—indeed towards the end of the season we uncovered a lower phase of architecture beneath this season’s, which will be an exciting facet of exploration for next season!

Photo 3: A hazelnut (?), one of many charred remains found alongside the coarse wares and cooking instillations this season.
Photo 3: A hazelnut (?), one of many charred remains found alongside the coarse wares and cooking instillations this season.
Photo 4: A cross section of one of the various cooking instillations excavated this year.
Photo 4: A cross section of one of the various cooking instillations excavated this year.

Sheldon Harmacy is a PhD student at the University of Toronto where he explores the relationship between changing materiality and technological progress in the context of the Early Brone Age of the Ancient Near East. He is a proud alumni of both the University of Lethbridge and University of Toronto receiving both a BA in Archaeology and Geography (2019) and an MA in Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations (2022). He has participated in the last two field seasons at Tell Tayinat and aims to utilize the lithic (chipped stone) assemblage from the site for his thesis research.

Tayinat Archaeological Project Website: https://tayinat.artsci.utoronto.ca/

Photo 5: Myself and my partner Mariah (another member of the excavation) on a weekend excursion to the Titus Tunnel Aquaduct in Hatay.
Photo 5: Myself and my partner Mariah (another member of the excavation) on a weekend excursion to the Titus Tunnel Aquaduct in Hatay.

Want to help more students and early career archaeologists get into the field? Donate to the cause today by selecting “Fieldwork Scholarships” as your gift purpose!

Fieldwork Report: Suzanne Gilles

A Month on the Island

Suzanne Gilles, 2024 Katherine Barton Platt Fieldwork Scholarship Recipient

On 7th of May 2024, I received an email from ASOR telling me that I had been awarded a scholarship to excavate at the site of Kissonerga-Skalia, in Cyprus. This email gave a whole new perspective on what my summer was going to be.

The dig lasted a month, under the Mediterranean sun, with the island’s humidity, and with a light breeze during the afternoons. I was surrounded by this amazing scenery of the Troodos mountains, the blue waters of the sea, and so many archaeological sites to visit.

I have always been curious to understand what Cyprus was like during Antiquity and more precisely during the Bronze Age. I want to specialize in Levantine archaeology and the link between the island and the mainland is something that I wanted to explore in my research. The excavation at Kissonerga-Skalia was the perfect opportunity for me to learn more about it.

View from the Troodos mountains (Image credit: Suzanne Gilles)

This site is located in the south-western part of the island and was occupied continuously from the beginning of the Early Bronze Age (c.2600) until the beginning of the Late Bronze Age (c.1600). It also has an earlier Chalcolithic occupation that is connected to the nearby site of Kissonerga-Mosfilia.

The excavation is focused on uncovering the industrial area of the site, where a number of features have already been identified, including an oven-like installation, probably used to produce beer! The installations were very diverse, as were the finds, that were a great sample to understand what Cyprus looked like during this period of history.

For the first time, I saw Cyprus as an independent and innovative island, and not as a region whose material culture is merely the product of continental influence. By observing the shapes of the pottery, artifacts, the architectural features and the organization of the settlements, I began slowly to understand the regional specificities.

Plan drawings on site (Image credit: Talia Neelis)

I’ve learned so much from this experience. The excavation being a field school, we were not only trained to excavate, but also to do pottery dating, drawing plans, photography. There was a real desire to show us as much as possible and to share a common passion for Cypriot archaeology.

For four weeks, we lived as a community with a very strict routine: waking up at 4:30am, walking to the site at 5am, working until 12:30 to avoid the afternoon heat and then coming back from the site to do some post-excavation work. I will cherish the little moments that made this intense schedule so enjoyable: eating the delicious chocolate cookies during the breaks, swimming in the sea after a long day, washing the pottery with fresh water.

Amanda, Suzanne’s coworker defining rocks (Image credit: Suzanne Gilles)

On the site, I was assigned to articulate stones, a plaster surface and all the small finds that could be found in these areas, such as pottery, bones, stone tools, and two amazing beads that were my highlights of the season!

However, as all the archaeology students know, even if you are going on an excavation to learn about new methods and cultures, you discover and come back with much more than that. The people that you meet on this little journey shape you as a human being and a future archaeologist. I am so grateful for all the memories and life lessons that I am taking back to France, which are bringing me a bit closer to my dream career.

Reconstruction of a Late Chalcolithic house in Lemba, a neighboring site (Image credit: Suzanne Gilles)
Team from Suzanne’s area (Image credit: Ian Hill)

Suzanne Gilles is a 20-year-old graduate student in the Near Eastern Studies specialty in the School of the Louvre, Paris (France). She wants to specialize in Levantine archaeology during the Bronze Age.

Want to help more students and early career archaeologists get into the field? Donate to the cause today by selecting “Fieldwork Scholarships” as your gift purpose!

Fieldwork Report: Madeline Conigliaro-Nguyen

Sun, Sweat, and Sheep Bones: Zooarchaeology at Gird-I Matrab

Madeline Conigliaro-Nguyen, 2024 Eric and Carol Meyers Scholarship for Fieldwork Participation

My second season at the Gird-I Matrab project from May to June 2024 was an opportunity to continue to develop my in-field experience and zooarchaeology-related skills, thanks to the wonderful support of Dr. Eric and Dr. Carol Meyers, ASOR, director Prof. Rocco Palermo (Bryn Mawr College) and co-director Prof. Nathalie Brusgaard (Leiden University). My primary responsibility on the team for the 2024 season was to continue as the zooarchaeology assistant. Under the instruction and mentorship of Prof. Brusgaard (who was remote this year), I cared for and managed the faunal remains collected on-site. This included processing and cataloging the faunal material for later study seasons.

Fig. 1. GMAP 2024 project team in Ankawa, Erbil. (©Federico Dalla Battista)
Fig. 1. GMAP 2024 project team in Ankawa, Erbil. (©Federico Dalla Battista)

Gird-I Matrab, located in the Erbil Plains of Kurdistan Region of Iraq, is a site consisting of multiple low mounds with two major phases of occupation, the Late Chalcolithic period and the Seleucid period. Excavation in areas A and B, begun during the previous two seasons, continued in 2024. This season Gird-I Matrab also expanded operations with the goal of doing a sounding and determining the stratigraphic sequence at Area C. Early subsurface findings changed our plans, resulting in more intense excavation of Area C than originally intended.

Fig. 2. GMAP 2024 site topographic map. (©GMAP)
Fig. 2. GMAP 2024 site topographic map. (©GMAP)

The saying ‘The early bird gets the worm’ rings true for both our avian friends and archaeologists in the heat of Southwest Asia. Everything begins bright and early, with a 3:30 am wake-up for breakfast, and a 4:30 am departure to reach the field within the hour. Most of my time was spent in Area A as a trench assistant. When needed I would assist in extracting particularly fragile remains, identification, and updating in-field bone logs. Generally, I worked per the direction of trench supervisors excavating, cleaning, bagging, and tagging, and discussing stratigraphic context. One thing no one prepares you for is the challenge of distinguishing crumbling mudbricks from dirt, especially with the sun’s glare making it feel nearly impossible most days. Thanks to the patience of my trench supervisors and a good pair of sunglasses, however, I ended this season feeling much more confident in identifying features, a goal I had set for myself this year.

Fig. 3 . Sunrise photo at area A (Left) Baby birds nested on project site between areas (Right)
Fig. 3. Sunrise photo at Area A (Left). Baby birds nested on project site between areas (Right).

I processed the faunal remains for all three areas once they were brought back to the field house. Though a bit tedious, it is incredibly rewarding to understand human history one fragment at a time. Bones were cleaned carefully and laid out to dry over a minimum of 24 hours. Identifiable bones were recorded with species, bone type, side, and taphonomic markings when applicable. The common animals identified remained consistent with previous seasons’ findings, including sheep (Ovis aries), goat (Capra hircus), pig (Sus scrofa domesticus), equids (Equus sp.), and cattle (Bos taurus). After a unit was closed, all faunal materials were counted, weighed, and photographed as necessary. Bone samples for carbon-14 dating were selected by collaborative effort between directors and trench supervisors. At the end of the season, I wrote the preliminary faunal findings for the 2024 season field report.

Fig. 4 . Selection o f faunal remains from Area C ( SU 1030 ). (©GMAP)
Fig. 4. Selection of faunal remains from Area C (SU 1030). (©GMAP)

This year, I wanted to explore 3-D modeling during my free time as I felt it would be worthwhile to create an accessible and digitized reference collection of diagnostic pieces that were best preserved or particularly notable. Using Polycam, a photogrammetry modeling mobile application, I took detailed photos from all angles which were stitched together using the program to create 3-D models. This process was a lot of trial and error from figuring out how to make sure the background wasn’t incorporated in the result, to finding proper lighting for the bone details to show. I hope to continue building this digitized reference collection for future teaching and project-related applications. I also would like to use this newfound skill to continue creating bone models for zooarchaeological purposes. I am incredibly passionate about accessible and open-access resources, and I believe the digitization of collections is one of the most attainable ways to do so.

Fig. 5 . 3D model of right maxilla with DP3 - M1 dentition of a sub - adult pig ( Sus scrofa domesticus ), from Area A ( SU 1221 ).
Fig. 5. 3D model of right maxilla with DP3-M1 dentition of a sub-adult pig (Sus scrofa domesticus), from Area A (SU 1221).

Of course, as hard as this team worked on-site, we equally had fun off-site! We explored an assortment of different places including spending a night in Duhok, visiting the Faida rock reliefs, exploring the bazaar, and a special tour inside the Erbil citadel. My favorite place to date that I visited is the Lalish Temple. Located in a mountain valley in the Nineveh province, the Lalish temple has a sacred significance and is an important pilgrimage site for the Yazidi religion. I felt a sense of peace while walking through the village, along with the kindness of the devotees who had come to worship. We got the opportunity to sit for chai and tour parts of the temple, taking time to experience the diversity of religion and culture.

Fig. 6 . General photo of Lalish (Left) Depiction of peacock angel Tawûsî Melek (Middle) Olive Oil Jars (Right) .
Fig. 6 . General photo of Lalish (Left). Depiction of peacock angel Tawûsî Melek (Middle). Olive Oil Jars (Right).

My time spent with the Gird-I Matrab project over the past two seasons has been essential in my development as an archaeologist and for my excavation skills. I have been able to learn so much about the Northern Mesopotamian region and participate in an excavation project that has supported my developing interest in zooarchaeology. Thanks to our incredible international collaborative group of researchers, the 2024 season had another year of successful excavation. I am committed to utilizing all I have learned while on-site for my future academic pursuits in archaeology and want to extend a final thank you to all those who have supported and shaped my journey during the 2024 season at Gird-I Matrab.

Fig. 7 . Photo of Madeline Conigliaro - Nguyen on Area A. (©Federico Dalla Battista)
Fig. 7. Photo of Madeline Conigliaro-Nguyen on Area A. (©Federico Dalla Battista)

Madeline Conigliaro-Nguyen graduated with her MA from the University of Chicago in 2023. She continues to participate in several archaeology projects in the Kurdistan Region with the intention of applying for graduate school this year. Her primary research interest is in zooarchaeology in Southwest Asia, with a focus on human-animal relationships, particularly as they pertain to ancient ontologies, subsistence strategies, and the social and ritual roles of animals. To learn more about the project, follow @gmap_erbil on Instagram!

Want to help more students and early career archaeologists get into the field? Donate to the cause today by selecting “Excavation Scholarships” as your gift purpose!

Cultural Heritage Committee Seeks New Members

A view of columns at the site of Beit She'an in Israel.

Cultural Heritage Committee Seeks New Members

*10/23/2024 – The Cultural Heritage Committee is no longer accepting applications. Thank you for your interest.

ASOR’s Cultural Heritage Committee is placing a call for consideration for membership on the Committee for the class of 2027 with a number of open slots beginning January 2025. You can read about the Committee’s charge and purpose here.

The Committee has actively worked to energize ASOR’s membership to respond to renewal requests of Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) under the US Cultural Property Implementation Act for areas central to ASOR’s mission; hosted an FOA webinar “A World at War: Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of Conflict“; organized a workshop, “Giving it Back: Repatriation and the Ownership of Antiquity”, at the 2023 Annual Meeting; and will be hosting another workshop, “Repatriation in the Global Context”, at the upcoming 2024 Annual Meeting.

Committee members serve a three-year renewable term and are expected to attend monthly committee meetings, conducted via Zoom. All committee members should be members of ASOR.

Please email a brief CV and explain why you are interested in being a part of this committee and what insights you would bring to the committee on cultural heritage issues to the Chair of the committee, Jane DeRose Evans: jevans@temple.edu. We are especially interested in applications from ASOR members who are based outside of North America, as well as from Early Career Scholars.

Updates from the Strange Center

UPDATES FROM THE JAMES F. STRANGE CENTER

Since 2019, ASOR has called the James F. Strange Center in Alexandria, VA home. The building has provided space for the ASOR team to grow and thrive, but the passing years have meant that our home was in need of some improvements. A leaking drain from our 3rd-floor HVAC unit pointed to the need for some facilities upgrades.

After reviewing a number of proposals and quotes for the work, ASOR contracted with Cardinal Plumbing and HVAC for:

  • New hot water heater to replace our 30+ year-old model.
  • New HVAC systems (furnace and air conditioning) for all three floors of the building.
  • New drain for the 3rd-floor system.
  • New thermostats on all floors that can be controlled remotely.
  • New flue piping in the basement.

The 1st and 2nd floor now have 92% high efficiency systems. The 3rd floor space was unfortunately too small to accommodate the higher efficiency system.

This is was a large project which involved multiple days of work from our industrious HVAC team. The outcome of this project is that the ASOR office is in great shape for the fall and for many years to come!

Removing old HVAC units from the basement of the Strange Center.
Removal of old HVAC units from the basement of the Strange Center.
Cardinal vans behind the Strange Center.
Fleet of Cardinal vans ready to tackle the project.
New HVAC unit in the Strange Center basement.
New high-efficiency unit in the Strange Center basement.
New outdoor units behind the Strange Center.
New outdoor units ready for install.

The good news is that not only does the Strange Center have great, new, up-to-date equipment, ASOR was able to pay for these upgrades by using distributions from the endowed Building Fund. Thank you to everyone who has made gifts to this fund over the years. Your gifts ensure that ASOR’s home in Alexandria can continue to thrive and grow. There is still room to add your name to the plaque. Make a gift to the Building Fund today.

Building Fund donor plaque in the Strange Center
Regan demonstrates how to use the thermostat at the Strange Center.
Regan demonstrating how to use the new thermostats.
Lucia working on the third floor of the Strange Center.
Lucia enjoys working in the cool environment.

Mesopotamian Fellowship Report: Agnese Vacca

“Crafting Complexity”. Pottery Production and Consumption at Helawa (Erbil Plain) between the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic Periods

Agnese Vacca, University of Milan, Mesopotamian Fellowship Recipient

Aims of the “Crafting Complexity” Project

The project aims at studying pottery production and consumption at Helawa (Erbil Plain) in a diachronic perspective–from the Ubaid to the Late Chalcolithic period (5th-4th millennium BC) – by means of technological and archaeometric analyses to ultimately explore the process of craft specialization and standardization, and their major implications for our understanding of complex societies in this crucial area of Northern Mesopotamia. Several studies focusing on ceramics have, in fact, pointed out that major changes in pottery production and distribution occurred in Mesopotamia in connection with the process of 4th millennium BCE urbanization, resulting in a highly specialized and intensified production performed at an extra-household level, reflected in the emergence of a standardized and mass-produced repertoire.

The project targets encompass the realization of mineralogical and petrographic characterization (thin sections, XRD, XRF, Raman Spectroscopy) on a selected sample of vessels (ca. 100 sherds) to reconstruct pottery traditions within the Helawa assemblage, understood as the result of different systems of production and consumption, passed down within a group or society. Furthermore, compositional analyses (INAA) are also envisaged to investigate ceramic production and circulation at an extra-site level, facilitating the comparison with the results already obtained for the pottery assemblage of nearby Chalcolithic sites such as Surezha, investigated by an American expedition of the Oriental Institute of Chicago (Stein 2018; Minc et al. 2019).

As a major output, the project aims at producing a database encompassing qualitative (drawings and photos) and quantitative (metric, petrographic, chemical) data intertwined with a solid stratigraphic and typo-chronological ceramic sequence, anchored to C14 dates. This dataset has the potential to carry out multivariate analyses to investigate in a diachronic perspective the relationship between the technical dimension of ceramic production, the degree of specialization, the transmission of knowledge between potters, and the socio-economic organization of prehistoric communities at Helawa, providing a frame of reference from a key-site to be compared with neighboring settlements in the Erbil Plain and more broadly in the Trans-Tigridian region.

 

The site of Helawa and the MAIPE Expedition in the Erbil Plain

During the last decades, dozens of international projects were launched in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq contributing to the definition of a new theoretical framework for this key area located in the Trans-Tigridian region, between the well-known Jazirah region and Southern Mesopotamia (Kopanias et al. 2015).

Tell/Gird Helawa (ca. 10ha) is situated about 28 km south-west from the modern city of Erbil, in the fertile Erbil plain, and has been investigated since 2013 – together with the site of Aliawa – by the MAIPE Expedition (Missione Archeologica Italiana nella Piana di Erbil) of the University of Milan under the direction of Luca Peyronel, with Agnese Vacca as Vice-director (Fig.1). Archaeological investigations at the sites of Helawa and Aliawa, with their multi-period occupation, allow an integrated reconstruction of the history of the region from the first Neolithic villages (ca. 7th millennium BC) to the fortified centers of the Parthian and Sasanian periods down to the early Islamic Age (3rd century BC-8th century AD). The MAIPE project carries out archaeological excavations, geo-archaeological and geophysical research, bio-archaeological studies and archaeometric analyses in agreement with the Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritage and the Directorate of Antiquities of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, promoting activities to enhance the local historical-archaeological heritage and disseminating the project’s results.

Fig. 1. Map of the Trans-Tigridian region with the location of Helawa and Aliawa in the Erbil Plain.
Fig. 1. Map of the Trans-Tigridian region with the location of Helawa and Aliawa in the Erbil Plain.

The 2016-2023 archaeological investigations carried out on the top of the Helawa mound (Area A) and along its southern slopes (Step Trench B) brought to light a seamless Halaf to Late Chalcolithic 3 (LC) sequence featuring an exceptional state of preservation of the structures, with rich in situ inventories encompassing complete and restorable vessels (Peyronel et al. 2019; Peyronel, Vacca 2020; Vacca et al. 2020). Moreover, two pottery workshops dating to the Ubaid and LC1 were excavated, allowing the analysis of both direct evidence of ceramic manufacture (furnaces and installations), and indirect variables inferred from the products themselves (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Tell Helawa with excavated areas 2016-2023. Viewed from the drone. ©MAIPE.

The last phase of occupation of the prehistoric mound dates to the early LC 3 (ca. 3850-3600 BC), and encompasses domestic structures excavated on the lower mounded area to the north-east (Area D)and one large tripartite building with adjoined rooms to the east and a courtyard paved with pebbles and sherds to the west (Area A, Step Trench B; Figs 2-3). After the LC 3 period, the site was abandoned and reoccupied a few centuries later, during the mid-2nd millennium BC.

Fig. 3. Helawa, schematic plan of excavated levels in Step Trench B and Area A. ©MAIPE.
Fig. 3. Helawa, schematic plan of excavated levels in Step Trench B and Area A. ©MAIPE.

A large number of vessels has been collected from the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic contexts excavated thus far and sorted out for chrono-typological studies (ca. 3042 diagnostic sherds). Pottery finds have been classified in relation to the detailed stratigraphic and architectural sequence allowing the reconstruction of a relative ceramic periodization, that has been then anchored to a series of radiocarbon dating obtained for the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic levels (Vacca, Peyronel 2022). This preliminary typological and functional classification of the pottery assemblage from stratified contexts represents a solid base to carry out targeted analyses on techno-morphological and techno-petrographic feature.

Materials and Method

The available dataset consists of 3042 sherds from the 2016-2022 excavations at Helawa, which have been already drawn, filed, and arranged in the MAIPE GIS platform. The whole assemblage has been sorted out in major ceramic classes, or ware groups (e.g., Simple Ware, Painted Simple Ware, Gray Ware, Cooking Ware), based on observable macroscopic characteristics, such as paste colour, hardness, inclusions, and surface treatment. Within each ware group, vessels have been then sorted out according to specific shape classes (open/closed) and morpho-functional types previously defined based on the statistical occurrence of formal and stylistic attributes (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Helawa, Late Chalcolithic 1-3 ceramic types. ©MAIPE.
Fig. 4. Helawa, Late Chalcolithic 1-3 ceramic types. ©MAIPE.

Out of 3042 sherds, 100 diagnostic fragments (25 dating to the Ubaid, 25 to the LC1, 25 to the LC2 and 25 to the LC3) have been selected and imported in Italy in agreement with the Directorate of Antiquities to carry out archaeometric analyses. Selected sherds are being analysed according to two main interrelated tasks:

1) Technological analyses: the different types of vessels classified according to morphological criteria, have been also studied and described based on recognizable diagnostic features related to specific techniques, methods, and tools, making use of digital high-resolution images obtained with a portable microscope (Dino-lite®) and experimental reference material (Roux and Courty 1998). Different manufacturing techniques (e.g., slab modelling, moulding, coiling, and throwing) have been identified, considering that each method produces characteristic surface features or macro-traces that can be interpreted as distinct manufacturing modes or potter’s gestures. Information about the formation and shaping process, including the use of rotative kinetic energy (RKE), has thus been described through the observation of macro traces recognised on the surface of the vessels and in cross-section. These descriptions have then been compared with information on the distribution and alignment of voids gathered through the analysis of thin sections. 

2) Mineralogical-petrographic investigations: a selection of 100 sherds has already been sampled and submitted to petrographic analyses at the Department of Earth Science of the University of Milan (G.D. Gatta, G. Morabito, D. Comboni). Pottery samples are being analysed in thin section under polarizing optical microscope, using SEM with attached X-ray spectrometer and EMP, to define petrographic groups homogeneous in the microstructure and groundmass, and to obtain a detailed characterisation of inclusions, matrix, porosity, and slip. Moreover, the mineral composition is being determined by X-ray diffraction of the selected ceramics (XRF) at the Department of Geosciences, University of Padova (L. Maritan). The ware groups, previously defined through macroscopic observations of sherds, are thus being reassessed according to petrographic groups suggesting a reduced number of fabric types identified through petrographic analysis compared with those recognized by the excavators.

Moreover, a selection of 50 sherds that have been previously thin sectioned in Milan have been shipped to the USA to perform multielement bulk compositional analyses (INAA) at the Oregon State University Archaeometric Laboratory (L. Minc). Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis is aimed to explore compositional variation in ceramics in the Erbil Plain, comparing the results of the Helawa assemblage with that obtained for the site of Surezha (Minc et al. 2019) and more broadly with analyses of ceramics from the northernmost site of Tepe Gawra (Rothman and Blackman 2003). Furthermore, the chemical composition of pottery will be compared with geomorphological samples collected in the area around the site and already processed by the Department of Earth Science of the University of Milan (A. Zerboni, L. Forti).

Preliminary Results 

While archaeometric analyses are still ongoing some preliminary results can be described in terms of petrofabrics and manufacture of vessels in a diachronic perspective, from the Ubaid to the Late Chalcolithic period. Overall, the mineralogical association of the analyzed samples is very similar, suggesting the use of comparable raw material sources through time, with a difference in the composition of the fabrics mainly related to the addition of aggregates as well as to firing temperature, the latter resulting in newly formed phases such pyroxene and gehlenite (Morabito et al. in press). The composition and mineralogy of pottery is compatible with clay sediments found in the surrounding area suggesting that the use of local clay is highly probable. 

Local production is also envisaged by the discovery of firing structures dating to the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic 1 respectively. In fact, excavations in Step Trench B, brought to light an Ubaid pottery production area with a large rectangular-shaped kiln (nearly cut through toward the east by a later pit), standing over 0.50 m high, with the firing chamber filled with ashy layers and overfired vessels. Immediately to the south of the kiln were a series of small rectangular mudbrick rooms that have been interpreted as pottery manufacturing installations and bins for clay preparation (Fig. 5). The small finds retrieved in association with the pottery workshop mainly consist of few ring scrapers, grinding stones, mortars, and lithic implements that could relate to the preparation of clay and the grinding of pigments (Peyronel et al. 2019). A parallel for the Helawa pottery workshop is represented by the Late Ubaid/LC 1 complex excavated at Tell Kosak Shamali on the Euphrates Rier, where similar small rooms made of mudbricks connected to kilns were brought to light (Nishiaki et al. 1999). 

In the next LC 1 phase the function of the area is maintained, as documented by the occurrence of numerous kiln wasters, overfired vessels and ring scrapers collected from dumping layers associated with pits and a probable kiln laying beyond the excavation area to the north-west.  

Fig. 5. Helawa, Ubaid pottery kiln K.119 (to the right); stone tools and ring scrapers for pottery manufacture (to the left). ©MAIPE.
Fig. 5. Helawa, Ubaid pottery kiln K.119 (to the right); stone tools and ring scrapers for pottery manufacture (to the left). ©MAIPE.

Fig. 5. Helawa, Ubaid pottery kiln K.119 (to the right); stone tools and ring scrapers for pottery manufacture (to the left). ©MAIPE.

Even through the centuries and down to modern times, the area of Helawa/Aliawa seems to have been strictly related to pottery production as suggested by the presence of clay quarries identified by geomorphological investigations in the surroundings of Tell Aliawa, and the identification at the same site of an industrial area for pottery production dating to the Akkadian period (mid-late mid-3rd millennium BC), with mudbrick platforms and installations for clay preparation and vessels shaping, and fifty large kilns, some of which reaching 2 m in diameter, organized in clusters and connected each other through a sophisticated system of underground ducts. Pottery production is documented also in later periods, in the 2nd millennium BC, as well as in the Islamic age. Nowadays, traditional brick factories are still operational around Mastawa/Aliawa, extracting clay from local quarries, which is mixed with chaff, water and tempered with straw, shaped through rectangular molds, sun dried and ultimately fired in modern kilns.  

Analyses on the mineralogical composition of sherds (XRD, polarized-light optical microscopy) suggest high firing temperatures during the Ubaid period compared to the Late Chalcolithic, when medium-low firing conditions prevail (Morabito et al in press). The clay composition and recipes employed from one period to the next in the manufacturing of clay vessels indicates a shift from the use of mainly mineral-tempered (Fig. 6a) to coarser chaff-tempered pastes (Fig. 6b) that facilitate to the one hand the shaping of vessels and, to the other, their drying and firing, avoiding shrinkage cracks and thermal shock (Skibo, Schiffer and Reid 1989).  

Finally, the observation of both thin sections under polarized microscope and vessel’s surfaces with a Dino-Light digital microscope (Fig. 6) provides information about the shaping techniques and the tools employed by the potters. In particular, diagnostic elements derived by the microscopic observation of the shape and orientation of voids, as well as the presence of surface features (e.g., concentric parallel striations, fissures and ridges) are being noted to identify the shaping techniques employed and the possible use of rotative devices (Baldi and Roux 2016). Data collected for both the Ubaid and Late Chalcolithic periods will be tested against experimental replica.

Fig. 6a) Ubaid (TH.18.B.96/23) and 6b) LC3 (TH.21.A.725/3) sherds from Helawa. Photo taken with Dino-Light digital microscope (©MAIPE).

Fig. 6a) Ubaid (TH.18.B.96/23) and 6b) LC3 (TH.21.A.725/3) sherds from Helawa. Photo taken with Dino-lite® digital microscope (©MAIPE).

References 

Baldi, J.S., Roux, V. 
2016 The innovation of the potter’s wheel: a comparative perspective between Mesopotamia and the southern Levant, Levant 48(3): 236–253, https://doi.org/10.1080/00758914.2016.1230379.

Kopanias, K., MacGinnis, J., Ur, J. 
2015 Archaeological Projects in the Kurdistan Region in Iraq, The Directorate of Antiquities of Kurdistan, Erbil. 

Minc, L., Alden, J., Stein, G.J. 
2019 A preliminary assessment of ceramic style and chemical composition during the Chalcolithic era at Surezha, Iraqi Kurdistan, Paléorient 45(2): 121–136. 

Morabito, G., Comboni, D., Gatta, G.D. 
in press Mineralogical-petrographic investigation of the sherds from the Helawa archaeological site, in L. Peyronel, A. Vacca (eds), Helawa Excavations I – The Southern Stratigraphic Trench (Step Trench B), Milano University Press, Milan. 

Nishiaki, Y., Koizumi, T., Le Mière, M., Oguchi, T. 
1999 Prehistoric Occupations at Tell Kosak Shamali, the Upper Euphrates, Syria, Akkadica 113: 13–68. 

Peyronel, L., Minniti, C., Moscone, D., Naime, Y., Oselini, V., Perego, R., Vacca, A. 
2019 The Italian archaeological expedition in the Erbil Plain, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Preliminary report on the 2016-2018 excavations at Helawa, Mesopotamia 54: 1–104.  

Peyronel, L., Vacca, A. 
2020 Socio-economic complexity at the Late Chalcolithic site of Tell Helawa, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, Paléorient 46(1-2): 83–107. 

Roux, V., Courty, M.-A.
1998 Identification of wheel-fashioning methods: technological analysis of 4th–3rd millennium BC oriental ceramics, Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 747–763. 

Rothman M., Blackman, J. 
2003 Late fifth and early fourth millennium exchange systems in Northern Mesopotamia: chemical characterization of Sprig and Impressed Wares, Al-Rāfidān: Journal of Western Asiatic Studies 24: 1–21. 

Skibo, J.M., Schiffer, M.B., Reid, K.C. 
1989 Organic-tempered pottery: An experimental study, American Antiquity 54(1): 122–146. 

Stein, G.J. 
2018 Excavations at Surezha (Erbil Plain, Kurdistan Region, Iraq) 2017, in C. Woods (ed.), Oriental Institute Annual Report 2017-2018, Chicago: 29–43. 

Vacca, A., Moscone, D., Rosati, P.  
2020 Managing Survey Data from Helawa, Erbil Plain (Kurdistan Region of Iraq), in M. Iamoni (ed.), From the Prehistory of Upper Mesopotamia to the Bronze and Iron Age Societies of the Levant. Proceedings of the Broadening Horizon 5, Udine, Vol. 1 (West & East Monograph 2), Udine: 107–124.   

Vacca, A., Peyronel, L. 
2022 Towards a definition of the Late Chalcolithic Period in the Erbil Plain: The contribution of the Helawa pottery sequence, in J.S. Baldi, M. Iamoni, L. Peyronel, P. Sconzo (eds), Late Chalcolithic Northern Mesopotamia in Context: Papers from a Workshop Held at the 11th ICAANE in Munich, April 5th 2018 (Subartu 48), Turnhout: 85–103.

Introducing ANE Today’s New Website

Introducing The Ancient Near East Today’s New Website

ASOR is pleased to announce the launch of our new website for The Ancient Near East Today (ANE Today), our open-access digital platform for public scholarship, disseminating the latest research, insights, and news about the ancient Near East and beyond. Free to everyone, ANE Today constitutes an important part of ASOR’s mission to encourage public understanding of the cultures and history of the Near East from earliest times until today.

THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST TODAY HOMEPAGE

The website presents a fresh, streamlined interface and will be the new home for all things ANE Today. All past and future ANE Today articles will be found here rather than ASOR’s main website. At the moment, all articles from 2022 to present are available.  We are in the process of updating and migrating the remaining archives (2013–2021) and hope to have them all available by the end of the year.

ANE TODAY’S SEARCH AND CATEGORIES

A search function has been added to ease your experience (and allow you to easily find that one ANE Today article you’ve been looking to cite in your paper). Contributors can find the new url for their past article by simply searching their surname. Not sure what you’re looking for? Categories have been added to help you explore our content.

ANE TODAY’S MAP FEATURE

A new feature we are excited about is an interactive map, located at the bottom of the homepage, allowing you to browse ANE Today articles based on the location of their subject matter. You can even enter the keyword from an article title in the map’s search bar to locate where an article’s subject matter is primarily based. 

Not familiar with ANE Today? ANE Today publishes short, informative articles by emerging and established scholars discussing a variety of topics related to the ancient world. These articles are aimed at non-specialists, providing the public, students, and researchers alike with snapshots of the latest research and thinking about the ancient world. The geographic scope is broad, covering the region from the Atlantic to Afghanistan and anywhere that ancient Near Eastern materials and culture have made an impact.

In addition, ANE Today publishes a biweekly newsletter. This includes not only early access to our latest article, but also a curated selection of links to relevant content — recent news stories related to the ancient world, new books, museum exhibitions, online lectures, podcasts — together with announcements about ASOR activities and opportunities. Issues of the ANE Today are disseminated biweekly via email to anyone who has registered with the Friends of ASOR. To receive The Ancient Near East Today Newsletter, sign-up here — it’s free and you only need to provide a name and email address.

As always, we are interested to know what you think about what can be improved. Feel free to share your thoughts about the new platform with us at info@asor.org.

Join ASOR’s Board of Trustees

CALL FOR TRUSTEE NOMINATIONS

The Trustee Nominations Committee announces an open call for (self) nominations for the ASOR Board of Trustees (Class of 2027). Trustees will serve a three-year term, starting January 1, 2025. There are three primary responsibilities of the members of the Board of Trustees:

  • Governance: Being aware of issues brought forward to the Board, attending two meetings per year (at your own expense), and bringing issues of concern to the Board.
  • Fundraising and financial management: Leading in development by thinking of new opportunities, leading in giving, and providing oversight on the audited financial statements. We ask that individual trustees aspire to contribute $500 or more annually.
  • Strategic planning and policy development: Leading especially in measures that accord with ASOR’s mission.

 

We anticipate two openings for Membership-Elected Trustees. Any full ASOR member may be considered for nomination as an Membership-Elected Trustee. If there is someone that you would like the committee to consider—including yourself—please send the person’s name and email address to Marta Ostovich in the ASOR office. Please check with the nominee as to whether they are interested in serving on the ASOR Board of Trustees before sending in their name. If you have any questions about the responsibilities and satisfactions of being a board member, please email Kathryn Grossman, Chair of the Trustee Nominations Committee.

The ASOR office, or a representative from the Nominations Committee, will contact all nominees to describe the responsibilities in greater detail, and to make sure that the nominee is willing to have his or her name discussed by the Trustee Nominations Committee. Please note that nominees will need to submit a brief biography and a mission (or vision) statement for what they would like to accomplish as a trustee to be considered by the Nominations Committee. A sample of these statements can be found in last year’s “Meet Your Board Nominees” webpage. Brief biographies and mission statements should be ca. 200 words each and submitted via e-mail to Marta Ostovich by noon EDT on September 23, 2024.

After the Committee selects individuals for nomination, the election will take place by electronic ballot during October. ASOR is once again conducting online voting to ensure that more of our members are able to participate in this important process. The ASOR office will work with any person who is not able to complete an electronic ballot to ensure that everyone is included.

In order to receive full consideration by the committee, nominations (including supporting documents) should be submitted to programs@asor.org by noon EDT on September 23, 2024.

AASOR 76 & 77: City and Cemetery

Annual of ASOR 76 & 77: City and Cemetery

City and Cemetery: Excavations at Kourion’s Amathous Gate Cemetery, Cyprus: The Excavations of Danielle A. Parks.

Volume 1: Context, Analysis, and Conclusions
Volume 2: Human Bone, Ecofacts, and Artifacts

ed. by Michael Given, Chris Mavromatis, and R. Smadar Gabrieli

The Amathous Gate Cemetery played a key role in the spatial and social organization of the well-preserved city of Kourion on the south coast of Cyprus, and in its transformations between the Hellenistic and Byzantine periods, from massively destructive earthquakes and the rise of Christianity to new social and administrative structures. The excavations were directed by the late Danielle A. Parks from 1995 to 2000, and found striking evidence for burial and commemoration, a wide range of material culture, and a large assemblage of well-preserved human remains. The project uses an innovative methodology for analyzing mixed stratigraphy and legacy data, which we offer to those researching sites with similar challenges.

Volume 1 presents the chamber tombs and cist tombs, quarrying evidence, and deposition activity from the cleanup after the 370s CE earthquake. It integrates the stratigraphy with the analysis of the material culture and the recording of rock-cut features, and gives a broad interpretation of the results of the whole project.

Volume 2 presents detailed descriptions and interpretations of the ecofacts and artifacts. These include human and animal bone, pottery, lamps, figurines, stone objects, painted plaster, glass, jewelry, coins, and loom weights. Scientific methods include isotopic analysis of the bones, Neutron Activation Analysis of the pottery, and spectroscopic analysis of the glass.

Annual of ASOR, Volume 76, Series Editor William Caraher, June 2024, 296 pages, 147 illustrations & 28 tables. ISBN 9780897571203, $89.95.

Annual of ASOR, Volume 77, Series Editor William Caraher, June 2024, 432 pages, 143 illustrations & 58 tables. ISBN 9780897571210, $99.95.

Special Offer for ASOR Members

ASOR members (with a mailing address in the USA) can purchase a copy of AASOR 76 at the discounted price of $35.00 (65% discount + $5.00 US shipping) while supplies last. Members can also purchase a copy of AASOR 77 at the discounted price of $40.00 (65% discount + $5.00 US shipping) while supplies last. Purchases are restricted to one volume per member. We are unable to offer this discount to members without a US mailing address due to international shipping costs, but you can purchase and ship a copy through the ISD link below. Please contact programs@asor.org with any questions. Click here to purchase your discounted copy in ASOR’s online store.

Available from ISD — Distributor of Scholarly Books
www.isdistribution.com

2024 Dana Grant Report: Exploring Continuity and Transition in Southern Jordan

2024 Dana Grant Report: Exploring Continuity and Transition in Southern Jordan

Jennifer Ramsay, SUNY Brockport; Björn Anderson, University of Iowa; and Craig A. Harvey, University of Alberta

Under the direction of Dr. Jennifer Ramsay (SUNY Brockport), Dr. Björn Anderson (University of Iowa) and Dr. Craig A. Harvey (University of Alberta) (fig. 1), and with the generous support from the Stevan B. Dana project grant, our project launched its first season as a feasibility survey. The primary goal of this survey was to explore archaeological sites around Petra for signs of continuity or transitions in cultural practices from the Iron Age to the Nabataean period (approx. 539-300 BCE). Previous surveys in the region noted material culture from  these periods, but few sites have undergone extensive excavation. This project aims to fill the gap in our understanding of this transitional period by focusing on cultural activities such as ritual, funerary, agriculture, and engineering practices. The survey targeted 12 selected sites where Iron Age and Nabataean material culture overlap, including Conway’s Tower, Mughar an-Nasara, Wadi Farasa, Jebel al-Khutbah, Madhbah, Khirbet al-Megheitah, Bayda, Wadi Musa, Umm el-Biyara, Ghrareh, and Humayma (fig. 2)

Figure 1 The project team in front of al-Khazneh (the Treasury) in Petra (from left to right, Dr. Björn Anderson, Dr. Jennifer Ramsay, Dr. Craig Harvey, Dr. Amanda Harman, Josh Feland and Abdullah al-Saket).
The project team in front of al-Khazneh (the Treasury) in Petra (from left to right, Dr. Björn Anderson, Dr. Jennifer Ramsay, Dr. Craig Harvey, Dr. Amanda Harman, Josh Feland and Abdullah al-Saket).
Figure 2 Map of sites explored during the 2024 feasibility survey.
Figure 2 Map of sites explored during the 2024 feasibility survey.

The field survey, conducted from May 15th to 30th, involved documenting archaeological evidence using Real-Time Kinematic positioning (RTK) with an Emlid RS+ device (fig. 3), traditional and photogrammetric photography (fig. 4), and written descriptions. No artifacts were collected; instead, surface pottery and lithics were recorded through notes and photographs. Over the two-week survey, the team visited and documented 12 sites. Significant accomplishments included high precision photogrammetry of Conway’s Tower (fig. 5), recording of undocumented architectural features across multiple sites (fig.6), including an apparently unknown nefesh at Mughar an-Nasara (fig. 7), and evaluation of likely Zoroastrian influences in funerary practices at Wadi al-Farasa. However, urban encroachment and looting have heavily impacted some sites, including several in the Petra Park; “Site 30” in Wadi Musa seems to have been entirely bulldozed and no traces remain.

Figure 3 Dr. Matt Vincent using RTK to survey in Petra.
Figure 3 Dr. Matt Vincent using RTK to survey in Petra.
Figure 4 Josh Feland carrying out photogrammetry of funerary features in Petra.
Figure 4 Josh Feland carrying out photogrammetry of funerary features in Petra.
Figure 5 Photogrammetry capture of Conway’s Tower.
Figure 5 Photogrammetry capture of Conway’s Tower.
Figure 6 Possible Iron Age wall under Nabataean features of the ‘Dionysian Hall’ at Bayda.
Figure 6 Possible Iron Age wall under Nabataean features of the ‘Dionysian Hall’ at Bayda.
Figure 7 Photogrammetry image of a potentially undocumented nefesh at Mughar an-Nasara, to the left of the staircase in circle.
Figure 7 Photogrammetry image of a potentially undocumented nefesh at Mughar an-Nasara, to the left of the staircase in circle.

The survey helped to identify several sites with promise to elucidate both continuity and transition between the Iron Age and Nabataean periods in the Petra region. Further exploration and detailed analysis are planned and the project aims to continue surveys and eventually undertake targeted excavations to deepen our knowledge of this transitional period. We would like to thank ASOR and the Stevan B. Dana project grant for making our work this summer possible. We also would like to thank the Department of Antiquities of Jordan and their representative Abdullah al-Saket, the Petra Archaeological Park and Qais Tweissi, the American Center of Research (ACOR) in Amman, and various funding sources for their support. We also acknowledge the wonderful contributions of our team members, Dr. Amanda Hardman, Dr. Matt Vincent, graduate student Josh Feland (University of Alberta) and our ceramic virtual consultant Dr. Sarah Wenner.