Dana Grant Report: Jamie Fraser

Trimble base station

Rediscovering Tsaghkasar: Surveying a Kura-Araxes Highland Settlement in Armenia

Jamie Fraser, 2026 Stevan B. Dana Grant Recipient

With support from an ASOR Stevan B. Dana Project Grant, an international team of archaeologists spent three weeks in August and September 2026 investigating one of Armenia’s remarkable prehistoric highland settlements. The Tsaghkasar Archaeological Project (TsAP) set out to answer a deceptively simple question: just how large was this Kura-Araxes settlement, and what can its remains tell us about life in the Armenian highlands more than 5,000 years ago? By the end of this season, our discoveries had transformed our understanding of the site.

The project brings together researchers from the W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem, the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, and the Near Eastern Archaeology Foundation in Australia. Our team combined Armenian expertise in the archaeology of the South Caucasus with international specialists in archaeological survey, material culture, and environmental archaeology,

The Tsaghkasar Archaeological Project survey team 2026

Tsaghkasar occupies a spectacular position on the southwestern slopes of Mount Aragats, Armenia’s highest mountain. At approximately 2,080 meters above sea level, the site overlooks an immense landscape of rolling grasslands, volcanic outcrops, and deeply incised valleys. On clear mornings, the distant summit of Mount Ararat rises above the horizon.

Surveying in the early morning light, Mt Ararat in the background

This dramatic setting raises important archaeological questions. How did prehistoric communities establish and sustain substantial settlements at such elevations? And what combination of agriculture, animal husbandry, and access to natural resources made highland life possible?

The summit of Mount Tsaghkasar above the site, looking west toward Türkiye

Tsaghkasar first attracted archaeological attention in 1985, when a survey identified Kura-Araxes pottery and architectural remains exposed by Soviet-era pipeline construction. Between 2005 and 2008, Pavel Avetisyan, of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, directed Armenian-German excavations in four trenches, uncovering substantial stone-built structures, pottery, and storage pits containing evidence of prehistoric cereal cultivation. Although these excavations are unpublished, they established Tsaghkasar as an important Kura-Araxes settlement. Our 2026 project builds directly on this pioneering work, extending archaeological investigation beyond the excavated areas to examine the scale and organization of the wider settlement.

Our first challenge was to establish precisely what survived on the ground. Using high-resolution drone photography, we produced detailed imagery of the landscape, revealing subtle variations in the terrain and possible traces of ancient architecture. Surveyor Guy Hazell then established a georeferenced grid using precision satellite-positioning equipment. The landscape was divided into 50 × 50-meter squares, providing a systematic framework for recording archaeological features and collecting surface artifacts.

Surveyor Guy Hazell (R) stakes out the survey grid with archaeozoologist Shyma Versmeerch (L)
Trimble base station

The team walked each square in closely spaced transects, generally 10 meters apart, searching for pottery, chipped stone, and architectural remains. This painstaking fieldwalking also allowed us to ground-truth the drone imagery: features that appeared as faint lines or shadows in aerial photographs could be examined directly, identified, measured, and recorded.

Transect walking a 50 x 50 m square below a basalt boulder

Some of the most exciting moments came when apparently isolated stones resolved into coherent wall lines and architectural arrangements. Each newly recorded feature helped us reconstruct the organization of a settlement that had lain exposed, yet largely unrecognized, across the mountainside for millennia.

Archaeologist Abi Cryerhall records a wall-line below Mt Tsaghkasar

The artifacts confirmed that the landscape preserved substantial evidence of Kura-Araxes I occupation, broadly dating to the late fourth/early third millennium BCE. The ceramic assemblage includes fragments of the distinctive handmade pottery polished to a deep, glossy black, often with a contrasting red or buff interior, and decorated with raised geometric shapes, while the chipped-stone assemblage is overwhelmingly dominated by obsidian, the volcanic glass prized throughout prehistoric Armenia for its exceptionally sharp cutting edges.

An obsidian blade (photo by the XX)
Portion of a Kura-Araxes I vessel from the 2006-2008 excavations

The most striking result, however, was the scale of the archaeological remains. In just three weeks, we mapped an 11-hectare settlement core, characterized by extensive surface architecture and concentrations of artifacts. Beyond this core, we recorded substantial peripheral stone enclosures, provisionally interpreted as animal corrals, within a wider archaeological and activity zone extending across approximately 40 hectares.

These results establish Tsaghkasar as a significant Kura-Araxes highland settlement. Its size is especially noteworthy at an elevation exceeding 2,000 meters, challenging any simple assumption that upland communities were necessarily small, marginal, or exclusively pastoral. Whether all parts of the settlement were occupied simultaneously remains an important question for future excavation. For our team, the excitement lies not simply in the dimensions of the site, but in the possibility of understanding how its inhabitants organized their settlement, cultivated crops, managed livestock, and negotiated the opportunities and challenges of the highland environment.

The team at dinner in the dighouse orchard

We hope to develop this successful pilot survey into a multi-year program of excavation and interdisciplinary research, testing our interpretations of the architecture and enclosures, refining the settlement’s chronology, and recovering new evidence for the lives of its inhabitants.

We gratefully acknowledge the generous financial support of the American Society of Overseas Research through its Stevan B. Dana Project Grant, the Curtiss T. and Mary G. Brennan Foundation, the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, and the W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research.

Want to help more students and early career archaeologists get into the field? Donate to the cause today by selecting “Fieldwork Scholarships” as your gift purpose!

ALERT: Fraudulent E-mails, Calls, and Phishing Scams

ALERT: Fraudulent E-mails, Calls, and Phishing Scams

Be Aware of Common Scams

Many organizations, including ASOR, are being targeted by fraudulent groups and individuals that mine for contact information to use in phishing scams, fake hotel reservations and mailing lists, and money transfer requests. Conferences and hotel blocks are often targets of these scams.

Unfortunately, ASOR members have reported receiving e-mails from scammers posing as ASOR representatives trying to sell marketing lists, fake hotel reservations, and other services in connection with the Annual Meeting.

These individuals are not authorized by ASOR, the Annual Meeting hotel, or any of ASOR’s partners, to contact you on our behalf. No one from ASOR will ask you to provide credit card or banking details to be sent by e-mail. Always check the e-mail address of the sender—a message from ASOR will end in @asor.org (not Gmail or another account).

Whova.io
If you receive an e-mail that looks like a scam, but is from a Whova.io account, it is not fraudulent, but it is also not authorized by ASOR. The Annual Meeting Mobile App is powered by Whova and we are working with them to disable auto-generated marketing e-mails that are on by default. You do not need to be concerned about or report emails from Whova. 

Please let us know if you receive a fraudulent e-mail or phone call. We will do everything we can to address this situation and we appreciate your cooperation.

Table of Contents for Near Eastern Archaeology 89.3 (2026)

Table of Contents for Near Eastern Archaeology 89.3 (September 2026)

You can receive NEA(and other ASOR publications) through an ASOR Membership.
Please e-mail the Membership office if you have any questions.

Pp. 147–161: “Türkmen-Karahöyük: A New Urban Center in Central Anatolia” by James F. Osborne, Michele Rüzgar Massa, and Hüseyin Erpehlivan

Since the mid-twentieth century, the Konya Plain, located in South-Central Anatolia, has been one of the Near East’s most famous archaeological regions due to its Neolithic heritage. The later periods, however, have been all but completely neglected. In this article, we present findings from the Türkmen- Karahöyük Archaeological Project (TKAP), an excavation that began in 2024. TKAP’s mission is to bring to light, for the first time, the cultural trajectory of the region from the Early Bronze Age through the end of the Hellenistic period, the sequence of occupation of the mound. As the plain’s largest site during these periods, Türkmen-Karahöyük promises to reveal much about social, cultural, and political dynamics in this underexplored time and place.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Pp. 162-174: “Metal Artifacts from the Lahsavareh Cemetery: New Perspectives on Elamite Metallurgical Practices” by Reza Naseri and Morteza Khanipour

Fieldwork conducted in 2020 at the Lahsavareh Cemetery in Iran resulted in the identification and systematic excavation of 12 graves. Grave 1 has been attributed to the Middle Elamite period, whereas the remaining graves have been dated to the Neo-Elamite period. From several of these graves,129 metal artifacts deposited as grave goods were recovered. They are made of silver, bronze, and iron and include metal vessels, ornaments, and weapons. All artifacts from the Middle Elamite grave were made of bronze, whereas in the Neo-Elamite period, iron became more common for manufacturing weapons and pins. Interestingly, some pins were produced using two different metals, with an iron shaft and a bronze head. Laboratory analyses show that, similar to most Iron Age II–III sites in Iran, the bronzes from Lahsavareh were made by alloying copper with tin. These results provide new evidence about the technological and cultural aspects of Elamite metallurgy in the highlands between Susa and Anshan.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Pp. 175-186: “Marking Pottery in the Cypriot Hinterland: Examining Pot marks from the Late Bronze Age Farming Settlement at Arediou” by Nicolle Hirschfeld and Louise Steel

In this article, we explore the evidence for marking pottery at Arediou, a Late Bronze Age farming settlement in the Cypriot hinterland. Three potmarks were discovered at the site in the course of excavations, adding to current knowledge of the practice of marking pottery on Cyprus and how this was embedded within the island’s sociopolitical and economic organization during the later second millennium BCE. Although the quantity is small, the diversity of wares, forms, and sign types is intriguing; this corresponds to patterns of marking observed elsewhere on the island and in the Late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean generally. From the perspective of potmark studies, their rural provenience is what makes the Arediou corpus significant. It broadens the question of where and why potmarks had relevance and raises the question of the bounds of literacy and how the rural hinterland was embedded within wider exchange networks in the Late Bronze Age.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Pp. 187-199: “Bioarchaeological Narratives and Funerary Beliefs of the Interred at Qeladez Citadel-City” by Behzad Hoseyni Sarbisheh, Seyed Mehdi Mousavi Kouhpar, Saeed Amirhajloo, and Fatemeh Zeynali Khaledabadi

Qeladez is an ancient citadel-city located in the Azna Plain, serving as a significant intercultural hub connecting the Central Iranian Plateau to the western Central Zagros Mountains. During our fieldwork, three distinct cemetery areas were identified on the eastern ridges, yielding a small skeletal assemblage; this discovery followed the observation of human remains resulting from illegal excavations. We systematically excavated five graves, which revealed a variety of burial practices, including both primary and secondary inhumations. A preliminary bioarchaeological study of these burials provided valuable insights into the historical period (Parthian and Sasanian). Despite the limited sample size, the findings shed light on the diverse funerary customs of the citadel’s inhabitants. Furthermore, analysis of the human remains provided data on age (ranging from 10 to 50 years) and sex (both male and female), and health status was assessed through dental and skeletal examination. Together with the archaeological evidence, these results deepen our understanding of life, death, and ritual practices at Qeladez and confirm its role as a spatial center for cultural and religious activities. Please note, this article contains images of human remains.

Please note: This article contains images of human skeletal remains.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Pp. 200-212: “Beyond the Monumental: A Bronze Age Combustion Installation and Domestic Practices at Site S27, Failaka Island (Kuwait)” by Majed Almutairi and Hamed Almutairi

This article provides recent archaeological data on Site S27, Failaka Island, Kuwait. Unlike the past studies that have been focused on monumental complexes, like F3 and F6, the findings of S27 highlight the daily domestic activities outside these significant centers. The focus is on the structure and sequential alterations of the installation, along with the ceramic assemblage and palynological remains discovered on an intact vessel (SU19) found in the combustion chamber. The presence of plant remains (rice [Oryza] and olive [Olea europaea]) in palynological analysis may suggest the presence of food preparation and possible links to broader exchange networks in the early second millennium BCE. The architectural, ceramic, and botanical evidence combined demonstrates that smaller archaeological contexts matter in researching subsistence, domestic technology, and interaction in the region on Failaka Island during the Dilmun period in the north Gulf.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Pp. 213-221: “Hidden Words, Portable Holiness: Concealment and Power in the Ketef Hinnom Amulets” by Jeremy D. Smoak

The two silver amulets discovered at Ketef Hinnom provide the earliest epigraphic witnesses to a blessing otherwise known from the Hebrew Bible, yet their ritual power depended not on visibility but on concealment. Inscribed with microscopic writing and permanently rolled into tight coils, the amulets housed blessing language invoking Yahweh’s protection against hidden dangers such as snares and evil. In this article, I argue that the concealment of writing was central to the amulets’ efficacy, transforming them into miniature sacred interiors that transposed the logic of temple space onto the individual body. By embedding divine words within refined silver and sealing them from ordinary access, the amulets enacted a form of present hiddenness in which holiness was made portable yet controlled. Reading Ketef Hinnom through the lens of materiality, scale, and ritual practice illuminates how hidden texts could function as powerful agents of protection in late Iron Age Judah.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Pp. 222-233: “Qal’eh Maryam (Maryam Castle)/Shekarbanu: A Sasanian Structure Along the Great Khorasan Road, Sar Pol-e Zahāb, Kermanshah” by Shokouh Khosravi, Iraj Rezaei, Sajjad Alibaigi, and Samer Nazari

This study examines a cave and adjacent structure at Qal’eh Maryam/Shekarbanu, 5 km west of Sar Pol-e Zahāb, situated on Kalgā-re Mountain overlooking Qara-Bulāgh spring (locally Qała-Bełākh). The site features a natural cave with a carved entrance and an exterior rubble-and-gypsum structure. While future excavations are needed for definitive identification, three potential functions are proposed: (1) a rock-cut tomb similar to Dokkān-e Dāwoud; (2) a Mithraic shrine, with the structure concealing the cave entrance; or (3) a Nestorian Christian monastery, suggested by historical clues and the site’s name. The architectural practice of building before caves appears at comparable sites like Aškawt-i Daya, Zerzevan, Pergamon, and Baba Qodrat’s tomb. Archaeological evidence currently favors the latter two interpretations.

ASOR Members with online access: log into ASOR’s Online Portal here. Once logged in, click the JOURNALS tab in the top navigation bar. Tutorials for how to log in to the Online Portal as well as how to navigate to the Portal Journals page can be found here.

Annual Appeal Letter

ASOR APPEAL LETTER

November 2, 2026

Dear Fellow ASOR Member,

It’s autumn at ASOR, and you, our members, are hard at work. Some of you have recently returned from the field, notebooks full of new finds waiting to be studied. Others are in a lecture hall or deep in a museum storeroom, finishing a manuscript or following the latest discoveries in Near Eastern Archaeology. And all of us belong to a community that has explored the Near East and wider Mediterranean together for more than 125 years. At a time when so much seems to divide us, that is something worth celebrating—and even though the autumn days are becoming shorter, our shared work and mission continue to grow.

ASOR has had quite a field season of its own. In 2026, we awarded more than $250,000 in fieldwork scholarships, research fellowships, project grants, cultural heritage awards, and membership and registration scholarships—a record fourth year at this level or higher. Our publications continue to share your research in print and online, and the Annual Meeting will again offer simultaneous hybrid sessions and workshops so members anywhere can participate. In Lebanon, Syria, Sudan, Tunisia, Mali, and Libya, where conflict and natural disaster threaten cultural heritage, we completed projects alongside local communities and heritage professionals, creating pathways for preservation, discovery, connection, and healing. Amid decreasing international aid budgets, we signed agreements this fall for more than $650,000 in new projects across North Africa and the Middle East, funded by both federal and non-federal sources.

A new sustainability report from the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) found ASOR growing in what has been a difficult decade for learned societies: since 2015, our membership has grown 41% and Annual Meeting attendance 30%, and the report rates our finances as strengthening. Your generosity is a large part of that. In this past year, 100% of trustees and almost 50% of our members made a gift. Thank you!

So, you might ask, why do we need a gift when ASOR is doing so well?

The honest answer is that growth, however welcome, brings new costs. ASOR is on solid ground financially, but keeping the Annual Meeting affordable means your registration fees cover only about 44 cents of every dollar it costs to run; across ACLS societies, the typical meeting recovers 99 cents. The $650,000 in new grants is fantastic, but those funds do not pay for the staff time it takes to research and write proposals, and we submit about three for every one that succeeds. Inflation has hit ASOR as it has your household, and we want salaries to keep pace so we can hold on to our skilled and dedicated staff. And with about 2,050 members—compared with a median of nearly 3,800 among societies with similar revenue—each gift counts for more.

Our goal is $200,000 for the Annual Fund. Unrestricted gifts give ASOR the flexibility to direct funds where they’re needed most: closing the gap in Annual Meeting costs, supporting students and early-career scholars, and responding quickly and effectively when heritage is at risk. If one part of our work is especially meaningful to you, you may also designate your gift to support it. Gifts of every size make a difference, and you can give online at www.asor.org/donate or by printing out this form.

This month, many of us will gather in Chicago to present new work, exchange ideas, and catch up with friends, as ASOR members have done for generations. In a year when conflicts in the regions we study have touched so many of us and the places we hold dear, we are grateful for the chance to come together. We hope to see you there.

With warm regards,

Andrew G. Vaughn, Executive Director

Kiersten Neumann, Trustee, Chair of Development

ASOR Office Renovations

ASOR OFFICE RENOVATIONS

Renovation of the first floor of ASOR’s home, The James F. Strange Center, began during the final week of September. The renovation aims to make the first floor a more open, multi-purpose workspace  with a full kitchen. The new space will allow ASOR to carry out community outreach work (hosting cooking classes, lectures, etc.) as well as hosting meetings.

ASOR staff have relocated to the second and third floors of the building during construction. The project is moving along and the hope is that it will be finished by the end of the year. Check out some plans of the new space and photographs of the project’s progress below. 

Plan of the renovated first floor

Photographs of Renovation Progress

Old kitchen and workspace before renovation.
Removal of old floor and appliances from kitchen.
Construction in kitchen area.
Reception area before renovation.
Refinished floors in front hallway.
Electrical work in the reception area.