In addition to consent to digitization from origin communities, there are other ethical issues regarding digital access, such as whether the origin communities themselves have access to the digitized objects. Here we get into the uneven political dynamics between militarily powerful and economically privileged states and under-resourced countries, often contrasted as the “Global North” and the “Global South.”  One example is U.S. military trafficking of documents from post-2003 invasion Iraq to the U.S., which resulted in the removal of physical access for Iraqi researchers, scholars, and other groups, and thus their rights to use the documents to tell their own history and narrative. In that instance, the U.S. military not only selectively digitized the documents to create its own war narrative, but restricted access to the website repositories hosting them. Furthermore, some U.S. government agencies then deliberately removed or passively cut off access to the websites as a result of a lack of funding, thus wiping out any access—physical or digital—for Iraqis.

A further issue is whether digitized manuscripts can be equitably catalogued so that origin communities can search for their digitized forms online. A good example is the Yemeni Manuscript Digitization Initiative, which is a cultural preservation heritage project organized by the University of Oregon, Princeton University, and the Freie Universität, Berlin that works closely with the Zaydi community in Yemen. The main issues here are 1) the assumption that cataloguing expertise flows in one direction: “Global North” to “Global South,” and 2) the current limits of Arabic Unicode & non-Arabic legacy cataloging and transliteration that assumes Yemeni scholarly familiarity with Orientalist scholarship. The idea of unidirectional training assumes that specialists from origin communities primarily receive training instead of actively shaping the ways that digitized objects are organized and catalogued, which is the main reason that access to these objects for origin communities become so practically restricted in the first place. These issues exist in addition to the question of how accessible these digitized objects are to Yemenis in Yemen who are dealing with the destruction of infrastructure through war, famine, political instability, and economic deprivation.

In considering ethical issues of access, we must also consider the fundamental intersection of politics and digitization. For example, while the National Library of Israel (NLI) has been involved in several projects to digitize and make open access both Islamic and Jewish manuscripts, the NLI’s selective mode of digitization intersects with state control over narrative of the country’s history. As a result, intelligence on Palestinian villages in British Mandate Palestine is purposely not digitized. The NLI’s seeming commitment to open-access digitization whitewashes not only its selective digitization of documents relating to its own history and that of Palestinians, but also the fact that Palestinian scholars and researchers are barred from accessing certain physical documents that are technically public, and that travel from the Palestinian Territories is so militarized it bars access to Jerusalem & the NLI itself. While Palestinian institutions have the expertise and will to undertake their own digitization initiatives, they are at a financial and administrative disadvantage since actively denying resources to Palestinians has been a matter of state policy. As a result, digitization initiatives in Palestinian institutions end up having to rely heavily on overseas funding instead, thus subjecting them to the funding priorities and agendas of their overseas funding partners.

It is important to note that the three examples of Iraqis, Yemenis, & Palestinians being prevented from accessing their own digital and physical documents involve severe restrictions of travel mobility that researchers from North America and Europe enjoy. Such limitations include the difficulty and expense of obtaining visas to travel to where objects belonging to the origin community are being held and digitized in the Global North. Even the most technical restrictions are all part of the same international system that fuels war, conflict, and occupation in Southwest Asia and the need for cultural heritage preservation in the first place.

Finally, we come to the issue of sustainability. The current discourse around digitization as a form of preservation assumes digital space as a permanent and stable repository. This assumption overlooks the inherent fragility of the internet, which we tend to forget is made up of physical infrastructure that is vulnerable to climate change, technological obsolescence, and general wear and tear (not to mention cable-chewing sharks). Maintaining websites, updating software and hardware also require a constant stream of funding, which if cut off will literally cutoff access. In the age of climate emergencies, can electricity be prioritized or even available for digitization in the next few decades?

It has long been clear that, in addition to war, violence, pandemics, and severe forms of economic deprivation, the biggest threat to the preservation of manuscripts, manuscript traditions, and the safety of communities is climate change. Although countries that are generally grouped as the“Global South”will be the most vulnerable to climate change thanks to the very international political and economic systems that make them ripe for extractive projects from the Global North in the first place, no country can remain untouched from the most massive global weather shifts, ecological disruptions, and mass extinctions to occur in human history. Our notions of culture and preservation cannot exist outside of stable systems and sufficient resources for origin communities, nor can calls for digitization continue with the assumption that our access to electricity as well as levels of energy usage will remain the same or be prioritized in the same way in the decades to come. We thus need to expand our notions of technology beyond machinery and even digital space in order to redefine preservation for future generations.

Raha Rafii is an Honorary Research Fellow at the Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies at the University of Exeter. Her article “Digitizing manuscripts and the politics of extraction” recently appeared in the open-access volume Variant Scholarship: Ancient Texts in Modern Contexts, published by Sidestone Press.

Further Reading

Akkerman, O. 2019. The Bohra Manuscript Treasury as a sacred site of philology: a study in social codicology, Philological Encounters, 4 (3-4): 182-201.

Carbajal, I. and Craswell, M. 2021. Critical digital archives: a review from archival studies, American Historical Review 126 (3): 1102-1120.

Kropf, E. 2017. Will that surrogate do?: reflections on material manuscript literacy in the digital environment from Islamic manuscripts at the University of Michigan Library, Manuscript Studies 1 (1): 52-70.

Odumosu, T. 2021. Front End/Back End: power, narratives, and naming, (video presentation) White Cube/Black Box: The Universal Museum and the Digital Age Conference, Session 1, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 21 June.

Press, M. 2016. Raiders of the lost archive: how newly discovered manuscripts of Afghanistan ended up in Israel, Hyperallergic, 5 October.

Rafii, R. 2023. Digitizing Manuscripts and the politics of extraction, in Brodie, N., Kersel, M. andRasmussen, J. (eds.), Variant Scholarship: Ancient Texts in Modern Contexts. Sidestone Press, 235-248.

Rico, T. 2021. Institutional frameworks and ‘capturing’ readymade culture, (video presentation) White Cube/Black Box: The Universal Museum and the Digital Age Conference, Session 2, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 21 June.

Riedel, D. 2012. How digitization has changed the cataloguing of Islamic books, Islamic Books: A Research Blog About Manuscripts, Printed Books, and Ephemera in Arabic Script, 14 August.

Saleh, M. 2018. Protection or plunder?Intercept, 23 May.

Click here for a PDF of this article.

Want To Learn More?

Rescuing Syriac Manuscripts in Iraq

By Amir Harrak

The so-called Islamic State invaded Mosul and the Plain of Nineveh in the north of Iraq in August 2014, destroying people, especially minorities, centuries-old religious and civil buildings, and cultural heritages, including collections of manuscripts owned privately or by institutions. Read More

Digitizing Manuscripts of the Trans-Saharan Trade

In partnership with the Ghadames Society for Heritage and Manuscripts, and with the support of the Whiting Foundation and the Hill Museum and Manuscript Library, ASOR continues to facilitate the digitization of an important collection of manuscripts within the UNESCO World Heritage site of Ghadames, Libya. These manuscripts serve as records of the the caravan trade which facilitated the flow of religion and scientific concepts, shaping the culture of the entire region. Read More

Click here for the Arabic version (رقمنة مخطوطات التجارة عبر الصحراء)

Hill Museum & Manuscript Library: Working to Preserve the Manuscript Heritage of Syria and Iraq

By Columba Stewart, OSB

The Hill Museum & Manuscript Library at Saint John’s University in Collegeville, Minnesota (HMML) began in 1965 as a project to microfilm monastic libraries in Cold War Europe. The Benedictine monks of Saint John’s Abbey were concerned that their European heritage could be destroyed in a nuclear war, and were determined to take precautionary measures. Read More

Not a Friend of ASOR yet? Sign up to receive ANE Today in your inbox weekly!