|
Preface
When dealing with complex circumstances
in a limited amount of time, it is not often useful to try to address
all the issues involved. An exercise, acronym SWOT,
was used at the Retreat to initiate considerations and solicit raw information
and opinions. The SWOT exercise is designed to help bring to focus those
issues and factors that have the most impact on the organization. SWOT
analysis provides a framework for identifying the most critical items.
The analyses are limited to a review of the significant Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats that
characterize the internal and external environment. Strengths reference
the positive aspects internal to the organization; Weaknesses refer
to the negative internal aspects. Opportunities reference the positive
aspects external to the organization; Threats reference the negative
external aspects. The purpose of the SWOT exercise it to isolate key
issues and to facilitate a strategic approach.
To provide additional focus to the review
of ASOR and its work four retreat groups were organized to look respectively
at:
1. ASOR Academic and Research Opportunities
(Moderator Dave McCreery)
2. ASOR Publications (Moderator Tom Schaub)
3. ASOR Programs (Moderator Eric Cline)
4a. ASOR Operations and 4b. Development (Moderator Holland Hendrix)
In the initial phase, retreat participants were divided into four random
groups asked simply to catalogue the SWOT factors that they saw as related
to the area of their consideration.
Based on the catalogue of results from
the SWOT exercises summary presentation were made by the respective
moderators to the whole retreat group and open discussion followed.
Subsequently the moderators, along with the retreat facilitator, Michael
O'Connor, and ASOR President Seger, framed representative statements
on goals and priorities for each of the four areas of review. In each
area these were limited to the three which were considered to be most
strategic. This was understood to be only a preliminary effort to form
an agenda of matters for continuing consideration.
Below the outlines of each set of preliminary
statements on priorities and goals are presented first. The available
summary presentations by moderators on the SWOT exercises are then appended.
The lists that follow in Retreat Report Part IV catalogue the "raw"
results of the initial SWOT exercises.
back to top
I. ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES
(Moderator: David McCreery)
Re: Adademic Leadership
Goal: Reestablish ASOR's reputation as a leader in
the field of Near Eastern Archaeology.
- A. Develop an academic agenda that is diverse
and collaborative, flexible but sharply defined.
- B. Be a better advocate for maintaining and
creating new positions in Near Eastern Archaeology/Middle Eastern
Studies.
Re: Committee of Archaeological Policy
(CAP)
Goal: Demonstrate the utility
of CAP or disband/reorganize. CAP is recognized as a committee that
effectively executes its mission to uphold standards for field project,
publication projects, and encourages/facilitates new projects. The peer
review process is viewed as constructive rather than obstructive.
- A. Advocacy of members / affiliated projects.
- B. Mediation role between projects / Depts.
of Antiquities / Centers.
- C. Fellowships for excavation, conservation
and publication projects.
- D. Importance of peer review process; make
more effective.
- E. Subsidize CAP tour to ensure broader participation
or devise other mechanisms to facilitate interactions between project
directors.
Re: Outreach
Goal: Outreach to institutional
members, individual members and the public, resulting in increased visibility,
appreciation and respect for ASOR.
- A. Inform members (institutional and
individual) of benefits
- B. Expand efforts in elementary, secondary
and public education / PR
- C. Cultivate our constituency - the next generation.
back to top
II. PUBLICATIONS PRIORITIES
(Moderator: Tom Schaub)
Re: Publications in General
Goal: Continue the professionalism
of ASOR publications by:
- A. Implementing policy manual defining the
role of the Director of Publications
- B. Setting high priority to clarify relationships
between the Director of Publications and the Executive Director (requires
action by the President)
- C. Setting high priority to clarify relationship
between the Director of Publications and the Chair of Publications
(requires action by the President)
- D. Focusing on NEA:
- 1. Put back on schedule as quickly as possible
- 2. Seek outside sponsors for topical issues
- 3. Expand market share to 10,000 subscribers
in the next five years
- 4. Target educators and educated lay people
- 5. Work with dig directors to develop subscriptions
among volunteers
- E. Refining text in by-laws concerning the
role of Publications and its staff (requires action by the Executive
Director and/or President)
Re: Publications Book Program
Goal: Clearly define the priorities
of a Book Program by:
- A. Adopting a policy that will attempt to
achieve a balance between books that will market well and books that
serve the discipline of Near Eastern archaeology more narrowly.
- B. Moving ahead with books that are presently
in line to be published by using the current Opportunity Fund as a
revolving fund for books. This should be given high priority.
Re: Fund Raising for Publications
Goal: Develop a fund raising
program to support the present program and new publication opportunities:
- A. Negotiating with the Development Committee
to achieve a higher priority in the pursuit and allocation of funds
for the Publications program.
- B. Pursuing donors to fund specific journal
issues and books.
- C. Identifying granting agencies for publications
and writing grants to support publication programs.
- D. Following through on planned overseas educational
travel projects intended to raise funds for publication.
- E. Developing new markets through timely and
informative educational projects for classroom use.
back to top
III. PROGRAM PRIORITIES
(Moderator: Eric Cline)
Re: Annual Meeting
Goal: Make the Annual Meetings
more inclusive and of higher quality:
- A. Provide better vetting of submissions
- B. Conduct annual assessment of programs immediately
following meetings.
- C. Make specific invitations to individual
scholars, subgroups and "outsiders."
- D. Ask senior scholars to organize specific
sessions.
Re: Outreach Education
Goal: Strive to provide for
more effective public outreach:
- A. Support the new Lecture Program sub-committee
- B. Provide more advertising and media saturation
- C. Establish kids/family outreach programs
at Annual Meeting
Re: Public Awareness
Goal: Make ASOR more visible
with the general public:
- A. Establish a new ASOR web feature with scholar's
names, contact information, etc. to encourage use by media for topically
related interviews.
- B. Do more advertising and publicity of the
Annual Meeting and other programs in such vehicles as Archaeology
magazine, BAR, and the AIA Newsletter.
- C. Provide pre-meeting releases to the media
of upcoming "hot talks" at the Annual Meeting.
back to top
IV. OPERATIONS and
DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES (Moderator: Holland Hendrix)
Re: Operations
Goal: Clearly define duties
and responsibilities of all staff members.
Goal: Reevaluate the size of
the Board of Trustees [40]. Has it become unwieldily?
Goal: Develop a Procedures manual
Goal: Prepare a publication
detailing who we are and where we are!
- A. Describing the range of scholarly endeavors
- B. Utilize the web site more deliberately
for providing information to members.
- C. Put minutes of the Board, Executive Committee
and Members Meeting on the asor.org web site.
Goal: Use CAP to develop a mechanism
for establishing a scholarly agenda.
- A. Make observations on the "meta-issues'
which could benefit from discussion.
- B. Make suggestions of areas of possible areas
of scholarly investigation.
Re: Development
Goal: Find the means to deal
with the realities regarding supports for the organization and put into
effect meaningful responses.
Goal: Find a means to resolve
tensions with centers with regard to fundraising and overlapping constituencies.
Goal: Find means to reinvigorate
the involvement of Member Institutions:
- A. Possibly sending extra copies of publications
(NEA, Newsletter) to offices of the Presidents and Academic Deans.
- B. Provide more time at the Annual Meeting
for Institutional Representatives to convene and discuss involvement
and organizational progress.
back to top
NOTES
FROM MODERATORS
Participants' comments
on the issues above are included here:
Publications,
Programs, Organization
/ Development
PUBLICATIONS (Moderator: Tom Schaub)
Strengths:
1. Niche market - ASOR members and widespread interest in archaeology
2. Academic quality of publications:
long term reputation
professionalism
primary research data
3. ASOR organization and membership
Weaknesses:
1. Lack of financial support:
staff size to small
reliance on volunteer staff
affects on quality of periodicals and
books
2. COP Structure:
reliance on volunteer committee
communication problems between chair and
director
confusion concerning responsibilities
/ tasks of Chair of Publications and Dir. of Publications
3. Priority of allocations among journals not defined - should profit
making journals be accorded better resources?
4. We are not reaching the broader public with our journals
5. Fiscal irresponsibility -
major deficits demonstrate a lack of proper
financial control by COP
Added comments during discussion -
good priorities to use available resources
have not been set -
continuity of editorship lacking
not reaching broader public in our publications
lack of information - such as listing
of our institutions in journals
no high quality books - good money makers
-
ambivalence concerning targeted audiences
-
no written by-laws.
Opportunities
1. Better management to increase efficiency and profitability
2. Tap the great resource of public interest in archaeology:
enhance the quality of photos and papers
in NEA
choose articles and writing style targeted
for broader public audiences
3. Increase the subscription base:
ask dig directors to encourage volunteers
to subscribe, perhaps by building in subscriptions to volunteer fees.
4. Increase size and breadth of BASOR while maintaining high quality
5. Make use of the many opportunities on the asor.org web page - establish
an ASOR internet committee
Added comments during discussion -
conduct workshops at Annual Meetings for
potential contributors to increase quality of submissions.
Threats
1. Rival publications which have captured the largest market share in
biblical archaeology.
2. Ongoing ambivalence about the role of NEA - what is its prime audience?
Biblical interests? Near Eastern interests? Simply public interest in
archaeology of the ancient world?
3. Basic lack of communication which threatens the viability of the
program:
from COP / within COP
to membership
basic facts of subscriptions and costs
of publication program would be shared more widely with membership.
4. Fear of change:
fear of taking risks in changing formats,
etc.
fear of embracing new approaches in book
styles.
Added comments during discussion -
exception was take to rival publications
as threat - our publications have different audiences.
PROGRAMS (Moderator:
Eric Cline)
Strengths:
1.
Small intimate setting of Annual Meeting/exhibits:
collegiality
connections with and among top scholars
commonality of interests
diverse interests and participants
connections with friends/ social opportunities
honors for colleagues
welcomes young blood
2. Promotes and stimulates interest in the field:
long and established scholarly reputation
growing
key ideas from senior scholars
many good intentions
presentation of dig results at meetings
ability to absorb new ideas
3. Leadership/other:
success on partnering with other societies
and organizations
opportunities and exposure
publications for classrooms
survived split with SBL/AAR in good form
Weaknesses
1. Too incestuous:
lack of involvement of junior scholars
lack of involvement of senior scholars
lack of involvement of foreign scholars
projection of exclusivity and unwelcoming
to "outsiders"
near absence of Arab Americans
near absence of Mesopotamian scholars
excludes the average SBL teacher
lack of coordination with other archaeological
organizations in the US
meeting on our own
lack of job interviews at meetings
expensive to attend (money and time)
conflicting dates with other meetings
2. Waning institutional support:
changes in constituency
lack of funds
conflicting scholarly agendas
3. Quality Control
lack of strategic plan
lack of annual assessment of program
spicier programs needed
lack of technology for presentations
4. Lack of sponsors and other problems
lack of commitment and consensus on part
of ASOR
lack of adequate promotion and advertising
5. Depressing Situation
bad blood with SBL/AAR
social atmosphere needs improvement
Opportunities
1. Public Outreach:
better use of resources
ASOR documentaries (with A&E, Discovery)
community development (coming out of "ivory
towers")
more effective use of publicity / taking
advantage of public media
promotion of lay interest
tours and cruises
more advertising
special workshops and seminars
absorb/emulate BAS
annual lecture tours by scholars
natural appeal of our disciples
world wide web
central clearing house of scholars and
topics (for media reporters)
2. Sponsors (Middle East Corporations, etc.)
fund raising
travel tours
3. Synergies with other archaeological organizations:
connecting in antiquity interests
upcoming connections with AIA (ala Jane
Waldbaum as president-elect)
regional multi-disciplinary/cross-border
approaches to topics and themes
4. Internal doctrines and fundamentalism
get rid of glass ceiling
more women
more minorities
more diversity
advance and broaden individual careers
people identifying themselves as ASOR
members as strategic
taking initiatives on topics (not being
just reactive)
challenges of impacting academic curricula
consider changing name/acronym
locations for our subjects (places existing
in academia, etc.)
Threats
1. Competition for Resources and Attention
SBL, AAR, BAS, AIA, AOS, ARCE, Recontre
CAARI, ACOR, AIAR
Pressure from special interest groups
Hollywood-ization
disconnect between ASOR and Academics
other organizations seizing opportunities
from us.
2. Becoming irrelevant - isolation/lack of connection with others
irreversible decline in humanities area
in academic curricula
lack of vision/focus
decline of community interest
delusions of success
malaise/lack of interest
geriatrics
lack of interest because of Middle East
problems
biases of cultural opinions
lack of interest at schools and lectures
what universities are selling us or not
3. Marketplace effects
expenses of meeting venues
rising costs of field excavations
4. Conflict in the Middle East
back to Notes index
ORGANIZATION /
DEVELOPMENT (Moderator: Holland Hendrix)
Opportunities:
Strategic Alliances
1.
Sister Societies
explore renewing relationship w/SBL (specifically
re-invite them to accept position on our Board)
explore relationships with AIA, AOS, ARCE,
ARIT, AAA, MESA, SAA, SHAA
2. Affiliated Centers
center contributions to ASOR
attract young students / have fellowships
increases membership
provide a wide range of in-field services
workshops
research facilities
positive representation of projects to
Antiquities authorities
ASOR contributes to centers
funding
public relations
networking to the centers
organizes meetings
umbrellas centers with CAORC
promotion of center accomplishments
Opportunities:
Communication
1. Internal
list summer field projects [we already
do this - see our excavation list
-ed.]
provide "real time" information that is
kept up to date
need materials for Board members more
in advance
use means of electronic communication
more fully
send our financial statements with explanation
for lay interpretation
report on Board of Trustees decisions
(use e-mail lists and web site)
when changing board members and committees
communicate w/ centers for representation
find ways to encourage better inter-office
communication
upgrade electronic list of members
copy Directors offices on committee reports
communicate roles and responsibilities
of committees and its members
meet deadlines (e.g. Newsletter copy,
minutes, committee reports)
develop institutional calendar with deadlines
noted
communicate field schedules with responsibilities
keep overseas fellowships opportunity
lists and awards up to date
create and distribute web site map [see
site map page -ed.]
create (or use, e.g. Yahoo list-MSN) ASOR
chat room/discussion group options
2. Constituencies and external target audiences
regularly update and publish list of institutional
members with dues paid
establish committee(s) to represent the
various fragments of ASOR
survey members on interests and disciplines
and publish results
define potential constituents and contact
them to bring into the field
do an analysis of panels/programs and
attendance: see if it is mainly reflective of where meetings are held
extend ASOR to include a wider chronological
and geographical area
dedicate Saturday to biblically related
presentations in return for archaeologically related topics on Sunday
in relation to common SBL/AAR meeting venues
define not only by interest areas but
by academic status
make more emphasis on New Testament/Rabbinic
archaeology
raise $2 million to carry out all these
suggestions
use our membership and contacts with ACLS
more fully
distribute information on the fellowships
they are offering.
3. Marketing Strategy:
use asor.org web to describe purpose [see
mission statement - ed.]
establish web links to other professional
societies [see links page - ed.]
finish new informational brochure
market who we are to leaders, presidents,
deans & leaders of other businesses, institutions
publish An ASOR Mosaic
create a coffee table book, full color
that will promote ASOR
develop press relations
get mailing lists of major publications
and send them copy
each member develop local press contacts
and personally given them ASOR materials
stamp ASOR and asor.org web address on
anything that you are associated with
set up interviews with local press when
holding meetings
encourage dig participants to join ASOR,
read NEA
decide on whether to join existing web
portal(s) on archaeology or create own (e.g. archaeology.com)
advertise, advertise
be more active in career awareness efforts
on asor.org web create a page of scholars
and their specialties
participate in international congress
on the archaeology of the ancient Near East.
4. Surviving, Growing, Flourishing
establish a process to develop a scholarly
agenda
facilitate and serve various scholarly
agendas
eradicate the perception of elitism and
exclusiveness
follow ethical policies
plan and advertise meetings for "regular"
people
provide training that students will need
to help them in their future jobs
work with curriculum planners and text
publishing firms (all levels of schools)
put student placement/job openings on
asor.org web
invite interviewers to our meetings
establish archives for "dead digs" and/
or "dead digs locator" information
identify job opportunities
cultivate support needed for individual
scholars and their schools
provide letters of advocacy
offer funds to publish old excavations
recruit volunteer help
back to top or back to notes
index
|